2.1 sec in total
43 ms
1.5 sec
577 ms
Click here to check amazing Ceequal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ceequal.com
The sustainability rating scheme for infrastructure and civil engineering. Complete your sustainability assessment with BREEAM Infrastructure.
Visit ceequal.comWe analyzed Ceequal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ceequal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value20.8 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value2,360 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value18.0 s
3/100
10%
43 ms
103 ms
560 ms
23 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ceequal.com, 76% (29 requests) were made to Breeam.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (560 ms) relates to the external source Breeam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 185.5 kB (11%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ceequal.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 184.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ceequal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 630 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (73%)
30
8
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceequal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ceequal.com
43 ms
103 ms
breeam-infrastructure
560 ms
slick.min.css
23 ms
select2.min.css
25 ms
combo
209 ms
clay.css
218 ms
combo
138 ms
loader.js
104 ms
combo
203 ms
js
46 ms
main.css
179 ms
main.css
183 ms
main.css
251 ms
main.js
252 ms
slick.min.js
2 ms
select2.min.js
4 ms
infinitytrack.js
57 ms
gtm.js
57 ms
logo-spinner.svg
99 ms
spinner.svg
81 ms
BREEAM-logo-white.svg
100 ms
781d1d6e-32d5-60f1-1d97-b8468aec447b
104 ms
94e4843f-ff86-b4f4-5b62-52fd19ea160b
98 ms
030d6d75-6dd0-b6b2-364e-21be35d2151a
99 ms
d5ebb6d7-27f0-e3b6-24be-268456fea479
165 ms
d2808b6d-963f-e225-9ce7-8b18f94fcbea
169 ms
cea065ca-f22c-3da7-bc7a-46c951d04c87
175 ms
menu.svg
163 ms
NHaasGroteskDSPro-45Lt.woff
211 ms
chevron_right_dark.svg
136 ms
77504299-c126-3550-816f-bd0a1aa1e532
382 ms
back-slash-green.svg
201 ms
quotation-light-top.svg
205 ms
quotation-light-bottom.svg
336 ms
NHaasGroteskTXPro-75Bd.woff
262 ms
recife-text-light.woff
294 ms
NHaasGroteskDSPro-65Md.woff
275 ms
ceequal.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ceequal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ceequal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceequal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ceequal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ceequal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ceequal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: