Tools & Wizards About Us
cegital.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

cegital.com

Card Store | Cegital Inc

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

150 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

277 ms

cegital.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cegital content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cegital.com

We Sell Genuine Examination Scratch Cards: Buy Waec Scratch Cards online; Buy Neco Scratch Cards online; Buy Nabteb Scratch Cards; Shop Online for your Top-Notch ICT Products in just one click.

Visit cegital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cegital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cegital.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cegital.com

150 ms

cegital.com

1542 ms

bootstrap.min.css

282 ms

css

33 ms

css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Cegital.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cegital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 267.2 kB (32%)

Content Size

823.8 kB

After Optimization

556.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cegital.com main page is 823.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 516.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 190.9 kB

  • Original 516.7 kB
  • After minification 511.1 kB
  • After compression 325.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 190.9 kB or 37% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cegital needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 216.7 kB
  • After minification 216.7 kB
  • After compression 160.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 58.8 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 44.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cegital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (84%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cegital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cegital.com

cegital.com

150 ms

cegital.com

cegital.com

1542 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

282 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

45 ms

css

css

47 ms

animate.css

animate.css

216 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

219 ms

et-line-font.css

et-line-font.css

210 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

211 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

291 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

289 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

290 ms

simpletextrotator.css

simpletextrotator.css

292 ms

style.css

style.css

351 ms

extra.css

extra.css

348 ms

js

js

66 ms

js

js

109 ms

126 ms

134 ms

128 ms

js

js

139 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

205 ms

65ba488626025cff82f091336fbf94bb.gif

65ba488626025cff82f091336fbf94bb.gif

121 ms

logo.png

logo.png

233 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

41 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

49 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

128 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

130 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

129 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

130 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff

128 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

374 ms

107 ms

78 ms

78 ms

sweetalert2@10

sweetalert2@10

69 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

159 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

113 ms

wow.js

wow.js

114 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

156 ms

isotope.pkgd.js

isotope.pkgd.js

189 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.js

165 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

229 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

230 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

226 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

234 ms

jquery.simple-text-rotator.min.js

jquery.simple-text-rotator.min.js

257 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

296 ms

main.js

main.js

297 ms

livewire.js

livewire.js

456 ms

destination

destination

45 ms

destination

destination

68 ms

Accessibility Review

cegital.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

cegital.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cegital.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cegital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cegital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cegital.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cegital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: