3.8 sec in total
1 sec
2.4 sec
410 ms
Visit cenacolo.com.mx now to see the best up-to-date Cenacolo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cenacolo.com.mx
Visit cenacolo.com.mxWe analyzed Cenacolo.com.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
cenacolo.com.mx performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value5.9 s
49/100
10%
Value1,030 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.089
92/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
1009 ms
132 ms
9 ms
158 ms
157 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Cenacolo.com.mx, 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Cenacolo.com.mx.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (52%)
3.8 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Cenacolo.com.mx main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 835.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cenacolo needs image optimization as it can save up to 835.0 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 667.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 667.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 435.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cenacolo.com.mx needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 435.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (70%)
63
19
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cenacolo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cenacolo.com.mx
1009 ms
language-selector.css
132 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
9 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.css
158 ms
jquery.wpcf7-starrating.css
157 ms
font-awesome.min.css
17 ms
jquery.rating.css
156 ms
jquery.wpcf7-starrating.css
153 ms
settings.css
267 ms
select2.css
198 ms
bootstrap.min.css
467 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
272 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
206 ms
theme.min.css
603 ms
jquery.js
397 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
273 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
475 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
539 ms
Chart.min.js
410 ms
css
25 ms
stack-90.css
533 ms
jquery.form.min.js
420 ms
scripts.js
477 ms
core.min.js
481 ms
datepicker.min.js
637 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js
544 ms
widget.min.js
636 ms
mouse.min.js
636 ms
slider.min.js
636 ms
button.min.js
640 ms
jquery-ui-sliderAccess.js
639 ms
jquery.wpcf7-starrating.js
638 ms
jquery.rating.js
640 ms
jquery.wpcf7-starrating.js
640 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
640 ms
select2.min.js
747 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
695 ms
woocommerce.min.js
693 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
693 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
694 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
732 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
655 ms
theme.min.js
921 ms
functions.js
667 ms
sitepress.js
667 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
679 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
logo1.png
192 ms
us.png
190 ms
mx.png
199 ms
slide_home-1119x800-1.jpg
590 ms
logo-home2.png
262 ms
decor2.png
258 ms
pleca1.png
259 ms
3.png
596 ms
2.png
597 ms
1.png
737 ms
home_pasta-800-x-691.jpg
545 ms
fondo_banner_experiencia_cenacolo-1255x698.jpg
545 ms
fondo_vinos_1229x819-1.jpg
602 ms
detalle_seccion_vino.jpg
589 ms
textura_cenacolo2.png
654 ms
collect
15 ms
UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4UpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf
13 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
592 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
26 ms
cenacolo.com.mx accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cenacolo.com.mx best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cenacolo.com.mx SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cenacolo.com.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Cenacolo.com.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cenacolo.com.mx
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cenacolo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: