6.8 sec in total
379 ms
6.3 sec
118 ms
Click here to check amazing Ceniky content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ceniky.net
Visit ceniky.netWe analyzed Ceniky.net page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ceniky.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value13,110 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
379 ms
213 ms
215 ms
6 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Ceniky.net, 12% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) relates to the external source Counter.cz.
Page size can be reduced by 43.3 kB (57%)
76.6 kB
33.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ceniky.net main page is 76.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 31.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ceniky needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ceniky.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (61%)
23
9
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceniky. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ceniky.net
379 ms
mf42_layout4_setup.css
213 ms
mf42_layout4_text.css
215 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
urchin.js
21 ms
ceniky.js
244 ms
zrt_lookup.html
35 ms
show_ads_impl.js
49 ms
h.php
847 ms
bg_head_corner_topleft_25px.gif
139 ms
bg_head_corner_topright_25px.gif
139 ms
bg_head_top_logo.jpg
231 ms
bg_bullet_arrow.gif
223 ms
bg_main.gif
230 ms
bg_corner_topright.gif
232 ms
bg_corner_topleft.gif
236 ms
ads
151 ms
zbozi.html
136 ms
osd.js
25 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
charlie.cgi
369 ms
zbozi.js
114 ms
count.asp
214 ms
count.asp
389 ms
count.asp
5342 ms
ceniky.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ceniky.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
ceniky.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceniky.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ceniky.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ceniky.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ceniky. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: