Tools & Wizards About Us
centerlake.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

centerlake.org

Center Lake Bible Camp | Christian Bible Camp | Northern Michigan | United States

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

82 ms

centerlake.org screenshot

About Website

Visit centerlake.org now to see the best up-to-date Center Lake content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about centerlake.org

Center Lake has been providing quality summer camps for over 60 years and we are ready to do the same for many more! Our well trained and dedicated staff are ready for another Summer of life changing ...

Visit centerlake.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Centerlake.org page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

centerlake.org performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.centerlake.org

64 ms

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

1796 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Centerlake.org, 35% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 28% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 567.0 kB (56%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

439.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Centerlake.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 545.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 417.3 kB

  • Original 545.1 kB
  • After minification 543.3 kB
  • After compression 127.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 417.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 64.1 kB
  • After minification 54.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Center Lake needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 140.3 kB

  • Original 396.8 kB
  • After minification 396.8 kB
  • After compression 256.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.3 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (37%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Center Lake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.centerlake.org

www.centerlake.org

64 ms

minified.js

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1796 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

58 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

62 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

57 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

62 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

58 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

59 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

61 ms

5a2977_8068787278b744b38438e0375a1b9271~mv2.jpg

5a2977_8068787278b744b38438e0375a1b9271~mv2.jpg

223 ms

5a2977_fb160b32c32e4211914ad845cd3314c4~mv2_d_1932_1920_s_2.png

5a2977_fb160b32c32e4211914ad845cd3314c4~mv2_d_1932_1920_s_2.png

384 ms

c5392d_7648b12abade4c7a8bba69d7d8fdeadb~mv2.png

c5392d_7648b12abade4c7a8bba69d7d8fdeadb~mv2.png

498 ms

c5392d_1a727343d7e746499a277e3a85db9936~mv2.png

c5392d_1a727343d7e746499a277e3a85db9936~mv2.png

416 ms

c5392d_1d862df8c4bf43f3ad80b27b7dc962d6~mv2.png

c5392d_1d862df8c4bf43f3ad80b27b7dc962d6~mv2.png

413 ms

11062b_dec06b794f8744fdb6b1e833fc8ff19df000.jpg

11062b_dec06b794f8744fdb6b1e833fc8ff19df000.jpg

376 ms

c5392d_b29599e146bf40ab8b927c4b4767be04~mv2.jpg

c5392d_b29599e146bf40ab8b927c4b4767be04~mv2.jpg

542 ms

c5392d_989c2967cc58464da88202b07063abd7~mv2.png

c5392d_989c2967cc58464da88202b07063abd7~mv2.png

579 ms

c5392d_117f0b9c4ecd40019b039957eee3646a~mv2.png

c5392d_117f0b9c4ecd40019b039957eee3646a~mv2.png

701 ms

11062b_aec16be0668e46ad92465f92c3af3ea1f000.jpg

11062b_aec16be0668e46ad92465f92c3af3ea1f000.jpg

485 ms

homepage-bottom.jpg

homepage-bottom.jpg

623 ms

5a2977_fb160b32c32e4211914ad845cd3314c4~mv2_d_1932_1920_s_2.png

5a2977_fb160b32c32e4211914ad845cd3314c4~mv2_d_1932_1920_s_2.png

629 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

54 ms

82 ms

89 ms

88 ms

86 ms

86 ms

82 ms

115 ms

123 ms

119 ms

117 ms

119 ms

116 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

11 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

33 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

21 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

10 ms

Accessibility Review

centerlake.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

centerlake.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

centerlake.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Centerlake.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Centerlake.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

centerlake.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Center Lake. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: