3.2 sec in total
867 ms
2.1 sec
168 ms
Visit cesprint.com now to see the best up-to-date Cesprint content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cesprint.com
Champion Screen Printing & Embroidery has been in business for over 45 years and quality remains our #1 goal.
Visit cesprint.comWe analyzed Cesprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 867 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cesprint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value28.3 s
0/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.155
74/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
867 ms
240 ms
56 ms
185 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Cesprint.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (867 ms) belongs to the original domain Cesprint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 80.0 kB (5%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Cesprint.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cesprint images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cesprint.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (72%)
53
15
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cesprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cesprint.com
867 ms
240 ms
modal.css
56 ms
bootstrap.min.css
185 ms
sticky.css
105 ms
template-blue.css
296 ms
pattern.css
112 ms
your_css.css
107 ms
font-awesome.min.css
109 ms
responsive.css
190 ms
css
22 ms
css
40 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
163 ms
quickview.css
162 ms
simple-responsive-slideshow.css
163 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
bootstrap.css
275 ms
shortcodes.css
218 ms
font-awesome.min.css
222 ms
jquery.min.js
268 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
245 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
272 ms
caption.js
284 ms
mootools-core.js
356 ms
core.js
323 ms
mootools-more.js
435 ms
modal.js
332 ms
bootstrap.min.js
343 ms
keepmenu.js
381 ms
ytsticky.js
377 ms
yt-script.js
388 ms
bootstrap-select.js
418 ms
jquery.moomenu.css.js
409 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
468 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
497 ms
bootstrap.min.js
570 ms
prettify.js
472 ms
shortcodes.js
481 ms
ga.js
15 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
logo33.png
62 ms
slider111.jpg
312 ms
BEARWEB.jpg
206 ms
logo-c2.png
113 ms
pantonematch.jpg
62 ms
inks.jpg
89 ms
press.jpg
107 ms
shirts.jpg
113 ms
logo22white.png
132 ms
asi2.png
160 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
47 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
47 ms
maps.google.com
45 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
collect
46 ms
embed
358 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLbOWw.woff
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
157 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
32 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
153 ms
js
63 ms
js
32 ms
cesprint.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
cesprint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cesprint.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cesprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cesprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cesprint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cesprint. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: