4.3 sec in total
464 ms
3.4 sec
519 ms
Visit cgisource.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date CGI Source content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cgisource.co.uk
CGI source was born out of the need for international Architects to express their ideas cross culture. We are part of Stephen George International company .
Visit cgisource.co.ukWe analyzed Cgisource.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 464 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
cgisource.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
464 ms
935 ms
223 ms
333 ms
338 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Cgisource.co.uk, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cgisource.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 74.1 kB (4%)
1.9 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Cgisource.co.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CGI Source images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cgisource.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (72%)
58
16
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CGI Source. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cgisource.co.uk
464 ms
cgisource.co.uk
935 ms
style.min.css
223 ms
styles.css
333 ms
nectar-slider.css
338 ms
portfolio.css
340 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
346 ms
grid-system.css
349 ms
style.css
469 ms
caroufredsel.css
445 ms
cf7.css
449 ms
css
636 ms
responsive.css
450 ms
select2.css
457 ms
skin-original.css
467 ms
menu-dynamic.css
565 ms
js_composer.min.css
563 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
566 ms
css
653 ms
jquery.min.js
685 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
587 ms
style-non-critical.css
586 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
674 ms
core.css
677 ms
simple-dropdown.css
677 ms
index.js
710 ms
index.js
710 ms
anime.min.js
809 ms
nectar-slider.js
906 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
809 ms
isotope.min.js
810 ms
salient-portfolio.js
834 ms
touchswipe.min.js
850 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
902 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
903 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
918 ms
priority.js
957 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
973 ms
transit.min.js
1016 ms
waypoints.js
917 ms
hoverintent.min.js
799 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
709 ms
superfish.js
743 ms
init.js
994 ms
select2.min.js
789 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
788 ms
CGI_Source_Logo_White.png
436 ms
SWISSOTEL_EXL_CGI_05_01-600x403.jpg
455 ms
CGI_07_CLOSE-600x403.jpg
614 ms
CGI_10_01-600x403.jpg
550 ms
CGI_14_01-600x403.jpg
551 ms
MIRKAL_EXT_CGI_03_02-600x403.jpg
693 ms
OGI_HOUSE_CGI_02_draft_2022-01-10-600x403.jpg
577 ms
CGI_14_Day-600x403.jpg
772 ms
SWISSOTEL_GR_STD_KING-600x403.jpg
694 ms
Galeria_Katowice.jpg
1022 ms
grid.png
723 ms
BANKIA_EXT_CGI_01_01-scaled.jpg
1204 ms
Harmony_14_CGI_22_03_V1.jpg
983 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
54 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
55 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
55 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
55 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
55 ms
icomoon.woff
667 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
992 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
224 ms
cgisource.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cgisource.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cgisource.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cgisource.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cgisource.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cgisource.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CGI Source. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: