2.8 sec in total
240 ms
2 sec
620 ms
Visit challengefencing.com now to see the best up-to-date Challenge Fencing content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about challengefencing.com
Trusted fencing, landscaping & garden shed merchants in Surrey and Kent. Challenge Fencing, trade and retail customers welcome. Trustpilot rated excellent.
Visit challengefencing.comWe analyzed Challengefencing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
challengefencing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.1 s
0/100
10%
Value27.9 s
0/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,520 ms
13/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value25.8 s
0/100
10%
240 ms
238 ms
111 ms
88 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Challengefencing.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (980 ms) belongs to the original domain Challengefencing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 626.9 kB (24%)
2.6 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Challengefencing.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Challenge Fencing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 430.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 430.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Challengefencing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (42%)
59
34
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Challenge Fencing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
challengefencing.com
240 ms
www.challengefencing.com
238 ms
home
111 ms
reset.css
88 ms
css
41 ms
responsivestructure.css
251 ms
styles.css
168 ms
shadowbox.css
168 ms
skin.css
165 ms
classic-081711.css
24 ms
jquery.min.js
114 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
83 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
165 ms
shadowbox.js
164 ms
jquery.sbtooltip.js
238 ms
general.js
298 ms
menu_accord.js
287 ms
galleria.folio.css
287 ms
galleria-1.2.9.min.js
311 ms
apl5hqu.js
287 ms
Untitled-2_edgePreload.js
304 ms
addthis_widget.js
32 ms
edge.1.5.0.min.js
243 ms
Untitled-2_edge.js
109 ms
Untitled-2_edgeActions.js
105 ms
Challlenge-Logo-Email.jpg
239 ms
FencePanels.jpg
492 ms
FeatherEdgeFencing.jpg
413 ms
Trellis.jpg
642 ms
Railway-Sleepers.jpg
377 ms
Wire-Fencing.jpg
375 ms
Ironmongery.jpg
375 ms
Gates-and-Frames.jpg
569 ms
Arbours-and-Arches.jpg
499 ms
Decking.jpg
504 ms
Garden-Furniture.jpg
497 ms
Timber-Gravel-Boards.jpg
576 ms
Concrete.jpg
662 ms
Arris-Rail.jpg
588 ms
Stakes-and-Rails.jpg
673 ms
Timber-Posts.jpg
729 ms
Planters.jpg
659 ms
Treated-Timber.jpg
671 ms
Chestnut-Fencing.jpg
725 ms
Aggregates.jpg
747 ms
Screening.jpg
741 ms
Woodcare.jpg
754 ms
ecofencing.jpg
755 ms
JobVacancies.jpg
881 ms
Brochure.jpg
974 ms
Sponsors.jpg
980 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
84 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
84 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
82 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
83 ms
ga.js
84 ms
priceToggle.php
666 ms
address_finder.php
669 ms
quickcart.php
671 ms
300lo.json
47 ms
counter.5524cceca805eb4b9b2b.js
27 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
84 ms
__utm.gif
78 ms
shares.json
68 ms
edge.1.5.0.min.js
563 ms
collect
68 ms
Untitled-2_edge.js
83 ms
challengefencing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
challengefencing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
challengefencing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Challengefencing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Challengefencing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
challengefencing.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Challenge Fencing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: