2.1 sec in total
213 ms
1.7 sec
218 ms
Visit challenger.com now to see the best up-to-date Challenger content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about challenger.com
Visit challenger.comWe analyzed Challenger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
challenger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.317
37/100
15%
Value13.0 s
12/100
10%
213 ms
81 ms
108 ms
112 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Challenger.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Challenger.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (43%)
4.8 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Challenger.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 153.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 559.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Challenger needs image optimization as it can save up to 559.3 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 867.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 867.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 505.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Challenger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 505.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (51%)
37
18
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Challenger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.challenger.com
213 ms
jY5NDsJACIUvVMQewb07T4CUNBOZnwxMm97eadOYuDBxB997vMeIFlxKFTOITT1oSHMjBY6GnSKbodLOZgETFfZcgTXwaxjxTpvUh4ZJKpqTBz4POrYDD2sBzsklObaimaYv-cLNPMcetZZ4tEKi5dPc5zD32Jx-Oc79dMGTTP6zDle8LTRR_3tTeQM.css
81 ms
M9B3LEtMSdRPLC5OLSnWT8vPg5KJ5anF-bmpYLYulAMA.css
108 ms
M9B3LEtMSdTPzMlMzyhJyq_QMYCKJOZl5iaWZObnFQMA.css
112 ms
language-selector.css
105 ms
css
53 ms
css
69 ms
jquery.js
167 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
139 ms
jcu7DYAwDADRhUIs9qBjAitx4ZAP2I5QtkdQQUf7dDfDgoNkzRxJQA2NAySFfKs-6jchtC5YKDL6dHSS4eYfowlWZeNW1Z37FFo1qgZ9zw3jNw1drZX3cQE.js
139 ms
M9T3SaxMLQrOyUxJLdIvLkksyUzWzyrWTy9KTc0rzk_OBgA.js
121 ms
FchBCoAwDATADxmD4IdKWEokaUuTHvp7dY5zcWhiTESQL0s1bXUVI_Hgb_kJtvJXBQUMkn0eN0t3R0uaGLZP1_YC.js
119 ms
M9B3LEtMSdRPLC5OLSnWzyrWz03MzNPLzczTMdEvL9BNzU1KTQFxAQ.js
279 ms
M9QvzixJLShKLS7WzS3NKcnMycxLL03M0U3OLdYHiupnFSNUAAA.js
120 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
30 ms
analytics.js
120 ms
challenger_logo.png
106 ms
1.jpg
106 ms
slide-1-thumbnail.png
544 ms
Challenger-focuses-on-your-supply-chain.jpg
508 ms
slide-2-thumbnail.png
665 ms
Request-a-quote-with-Challenger.jpg
507 ms
slide-3-thumbnail.png
661 ms
truckload-services-ftl-ltl.jpg
109 ms
special-commodities-services.jpg
507 ms
logistics-and-warehouse-services.jpg
540 ms
elgin-motor-freight-regional-services-300x123.jpg
540 ms
climate-temperature-management-300x133.jpg
540 ms
bulk-transportation-300x136.jpg
574 ms
BfQP1MR3mJNaumtWa4Tizg.ttf
456 ms
zR-6QGMCFX5j-6nbH_HpIQ.ttf
479 ms
icomoon.woff
523 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
549 ms
collect
237 ms
gtm.js
334 ms
skin.css
190 ms
140933535
70 ms
140937136
67 ms
player.js
93 ms
player.css
71 ms
ga.js
93 ms
vuid.min.js
90 ms
challenger.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
challenger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
challenger.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Challenger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Challenger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
challenger.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Challenger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: