2.4 sec in total
108 ms
1.7 sec
541 ms
Click here to check amazing Challengerpools content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about challengerpools.com
Challenger Pools Tampa’s #1 Pool Builder and Pool Renovation Company serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, and Polk counties.
Visit challengerpools.comWe analyzed Challengerpools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
challengerpools.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value2,780 ms
3/100
30%
Value1.649
0/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
108 ms
210 ms
42 ms
26 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Challengerpools.com, 15% (15 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (578 ms) belongs to the original domain Challengerpools.com.
Page size can be reduced by 192.2 kB (8%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Challengerpools.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 175.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Challengerpools images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Challengerpools.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (75%)
81
20
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Challengerpools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
challengerpools.com
108 ms
www.challengerpools.com
210 ms
swap.js
42 ms
bootstrap.min.css
26 ms
animations.css
27 ms
fonts.css
33 ms
shop.css
32 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.css
32 ms
prettyPhoto.css
32 ms
style.css
70 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
62 ms
style.min.css
69 ms
fonts.css
63 ms
sumoselect.min.css
63 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
63 ms
css
61 ms
styles.min.css
68 ms
front-flex.min.css
68 ms
ubermenu.min.css
67 ms
white.css
68 ms
all.min.css
86 ms
jquery.min.js
173 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
82 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
83 ms
tocca.min.js
82 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
83 ms
jquery.fullscreen.min.js
169 ms
scripts.min.js
171 ms
compressed.js
221 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
168 ms
jquery.fittext.js
167 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
169 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
220 ms
rellax.min.js
275 ms
main.js
274 ms
dashicons.min.css
275 ms
display-structure.css
276 ms
underscore.min.js
275 ms
backbone.min.js
277 ms
js
76 ms
api.js
62 ms
widget-init.js
76 ms
front-end-deps.js
274 ms
front-end.js
258 ms
nf-ga.js
258 ms
ubermenu.min.js
254 ms
front-end--inputmask.min.js
253 ms
css
19 ms
roundtrip.js
229 ms
Cody_Challenger_Logo.png
203 ms
www.challengerpools.com
380 ms
QViKxTp4-bb.jpg
217 ms
SiMwlALw-bb.jpg
215 ms
bubble.png
201 ms
waves-bkg.jpg
216 ms
photo3-b.jpg
215 ms
photo2-b.jpg
213 ms
photo1-1-b.jpg
274 ms
apsp-logo.png
273 ms
fb.png
272 ms
google.png
272 ms
twitter.png
272 ms
instagram.png
274 ms
bbb.png
275 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
155 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8Jow.ttf
185 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jow.ttf
211 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
578 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
433 ms
widget.js
242 ms
recaptcha__en.js
104 ms
VNHUJXUX4NHILGSC3RMDWY
16 ms
widget_app_base_1718701551140.js
31 ms
fbevents.js
34 ms
out
19 ms
PNZG5EIBSRHBDHJP3I2UHE
20 ms
out
20 ms
out
51 ms
out
51 ms
out
50 ms
out
51 ms
out
52 ms
out
53 ms
out
55 ms
out
54 ms
out
55 ms
out
54 ms
fu1CbmKI3k
381 ms
trigger
50 ms
pixel
55 ms
tap.php
107 ms
Pug
121 ms
pixel
17 ms
439978750089080
364 ms
in
54 ms
sync
61 ms
xuid
5 ms
sd
7 ms
bounce
8 ms
rum
20 ms
en-US.json
7 ms
roundtrip.js
21 ms
challengerpools.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
challengerpools.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
challengerpools.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Challengerpools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Challengerpools.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
challengerpools.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Challengerpools. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: