Tools & Wizards About Us
challengers.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

challengers.in

SKOCH Challenger Award - Honest Independent Civilian Honour

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

878 ms

Page Rendered

230 ms

challengers.in screenshot

About Website

Visit challengers.in now to see the best up-to-date Challenger S content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about challengers.in

SKOCH Challenger Awards, instituted in 2003, salute people, projects and institutions that went the extra mile to make India a better nation. SKOCH Challenger Awards – the honest independently institu...

Visit challengers.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Challengers.in page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

challengers.in performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.098

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.3 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

challengers.in

230 ms

mootools.js

85 ms

caption.js

113 ms

silverlight.js

132 ms

wmvplayer.js

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Challengers.in, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Skoch.in. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (363 ms) belongs to the original domain Challengers.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 142.6 kB (36%)

Content Size

391.6 kB

After Optimization

249.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Challengers.in main page is 391.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 209.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 25.9 kB
  • After minification 24.2 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 209.1 kB
  • After minification 186.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Challenger S needs image optimization as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 90.0 kB

  • Original 144.1 kB
  • After minification 142.0 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 12.5 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Challengers.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (35%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Challenger S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

challengers.in

challengers.in

230 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

85 ms

caption.js

caption.js

113 ms

silverlight.js

silverlight.js

132 ms

wmvplayer.js

wmvplayer.js

134 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

134 ms

avreloaded.js

avreloaded.js

148 ms

transmenu_Packed.js

transmenu_Packed.js

162 ms

template.css

template.css

170 ms

suckerfish.css

suckerfish.css

197 ms

red.css

red.css

198 ms

template.css

template.css

308 ms

suckerfish.css

suckerfish.css

363 ms

Skoch_Challenger_Awards.jpg

Skoch_Challenger_Awards.jpg

87 ms

traophy_noback.gif

traophy_noback.gif

350 ms

group864.jpg

group864.jpg

281 ms

backg.jpg

backg.jpg

214 ms

demod.jpg

demod.jpg

152 ms

x.gif

x.gif

67 ms

160x41_Get_Flash_Player.jpg

160x41_Get_Flash_Player.jpg

77 ms

footer_left.png

footer_left.png

70 ms

footer_right.png

footer_right.png

113 ms

ga.js

ga.js

10 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

challengers.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

challengers.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

challengers.in SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Challengers.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Challengers.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

challengers.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Challenger S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: