7.6 sec in total
1.8 sec
5.6 sec
173 ms
Welcome to channels.com homepage info - get ready to check Channels best content for Nigeria right away, or after learning these important things about channels.com
Visit channels.comWe analyzed Channels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
channels.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
95/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
1797 ms
3201 ms
62 ms
102 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Channels.com, 29% (6 requests) were made to Wurl-andrea.s3.amazonaws.com and 24% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Channels.com.
Page size can be reduced by 581.2 kB (82%)
710.9 kB
129.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Channels.com main page is 710.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 482.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 852 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Channels images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 104.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 446.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Channels.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 446.4 kB or 93% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)
13
6
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Channels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
channels.com
1797 ms
www.channels.com
3201 ms
application-853a2730c1b289333ddfec98f473ced8.css
62 ms
core-9a536becd6ac7aa2f8746117c893ff38.js
102 ms
programming
95 ms
iframe_api
395 ms
full_screen_video_view-2b0ad9bfdb5be1b5fcfaeb82bbb48e8d.js
90 ms
css
41 ms
analytics.js
287 ms
bkgd_header_2x-f4fae97d8275031bb6ab6851c2001083.jpg
285 ms
BrightcoveExperiences.js
90 ms
all.js
239 ms
me
189 ms
wurl_logo_horiz2-86c8ad5db785ae0c17baee7ab2876ab6.svg
111 ms
fontawesome-webfont-a0fbd98b232e7e1ef9cdaad813b26eb3.woff
73 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
162 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
227 ms
LqowQDslGv4DmUBAfWa2Vw.ttf
227 ms
2HG_tEPiQ4Z6795cGfdivKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
228 ms
HkF_qI1x_noxlxhrhMQYEKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
225 ms
www-widgetapi.js
200 ms
channels.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
channels.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
channels.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Channels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Channels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
channels.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Channels. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: