Access char.gd. The best technology news, reviews and insights

66

Performance

Renders faster than
79% of other websites
90

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 74% of websites
75

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
35% of websites
85

SEO

Google-friendlier than
55% of websites

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

364 ms

Page Rendered

371 ms

About Website

Welcome to char.gd homepage info - get ready to check Char best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about char.gd

Charged Tech is an independent technology blog and podcast, designed to save you time reading clickbait, getting you to what you need to know.

Visit char.gd

Key Findings

We analyzed Char.gd page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 735 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

char.gd

43 ms

char.gd

56 ms

nYi_hHGQu0N-RlCGpHHufZOhhJA.js

19 ms

js

64 ms

app.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Char.gd, 31% (11 requests) were made to Fast.char.gd and 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (120 ms) relates to the external source Fast.char.gd.

Content Size

443.2 kB

After Optimization

375.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Char.gd main page is 443.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 355.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

Original 30.0 kB
After minification 30.0 kB
After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 45.3 kB

Original 355.1 kB
After minification 309.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Char needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 68 B

Original 25.7 kB
After minification 25.7 kB
After compression 25.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 32.3 kB
After minification 32.3 kB
After compression 32.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Char.gd has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Char. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Char.gd can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Char.gd main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

char.gd

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Char. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

The best technology news, reviews and insights | Charged

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

char.gd

char.gd

nYi_hHGQu0N-RlCGpHHufZOhhJA.js

js

app.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

char.gd

char.gd

nYi_hHGQu0N-RlCGpHHufZOhhJA.js

js

app.css

app.js

css

css

rocket-loader.min.js

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

nf3Zsn8LqTYwUflHgfFjtsnxa_g.js

digital-ocean_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

logo_white.svg

AAEAAQAAAAAAAA22AAAAJDgyMTViYjdjLTFlMGItNDZkNC1iMGVhLWZhYjU1ZGIxYzBkMA.jpg

FortniteClient-Win64-Shipping_2018-12-21_14-00-36.jpg

logo_only_charged.svg

goo_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

twitter_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

spotify_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

MS_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

disney_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

fb_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

a16z_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

LI_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

samsung_61893afc760a7328052a373d489f88c5.png

Charged_09_3580431e48aedf97dcedf972d1481942.jpg

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

js

analytics.js

app.js

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

linkid.js

Accessibility Review

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

Areas of Improvement

SEO Factors

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

Language Claimed