2.1 sec in total
77 ms
2 sec
84 ms
Click here to check amazing Charles Haskell content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about charleshaskell.com
The Law Offices of Charles R. Haskell can help with all your legal needs. Find us at charleshaskell.com
Visit charleshaskell.comWe analyzed Charleshaskell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
charleshaskell.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
77 ms
58 ms
54 ms
766 ms
87 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Charleshaskell.com, 40% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (766 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 588.3 kB (58%)
1.0 MB
422.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Charleshaskell.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 518.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 401.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 401.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charles Haskell images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 184.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.3 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)
24
14
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charles Haskell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.charleshaskell.com
77 ms
minified.js
58 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
54 ms
polyfill.min.js
766 ms
thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js
87 ms
main.4a2d1e74.bundle.min.js
86 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
84 ms
lodash.min.js
85 ms
react.production.min.js
84 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
87 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
86 ms
avvo_microbadge.png
344 ms
8a598a_278c69e0f0f74159ba274b5335d723e0~mv2.jpg
426 ms
haskell_cutout2.png
441 ms
ba07e27df2dc4c0096b33849e6300ff6.jpg
183 ms
035244_daf103d6eddb4328bb84a9dc7cd3a0fb~mv2.png
183 ms
035244_af94f47ae8df4aa2bc69c99760146fce~mv2.png
180 ms
law-pay-button.png
432 ms
8a598a_278c69e0f0f74159ba274b5335d723e0~mv2.jpg
485 ms
avvo_microbadge.png
387 ms
bundle.min.js
115 ms
9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff
17 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
9 ms
111 ms
110 ms
109 ms
111 ms
107 ms
107 ms
141 ms
137 ms
141 ms
139 ms
141 ms
137 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
27 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
18 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
10 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
5 ms
charleshaskell.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
charleshaskell.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
charleshaskell.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charleshaskell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charleshaskell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
charleshaskell.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Charles Haskell. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: