Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

79.4 sec in total

First Response

369 ms

Resources Loaded

16 sec

Page Rendered

63 sec

charlestonfoodbloggers.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to charlestonfoodbloggers.com homepage info - get ready to check Charlestonfoodbloggers best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about charlestonfoodbloggers.com

Visit charlestonfoodbloggers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Charlestonfoodbloggers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 79 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

charlestonfoodbloggers.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.099

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

charlestonfoodbloggers.com

369 ms

charlestonfoodbloggers.com

2179 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

177 ms

owl.carousel.css

244 ms

owl.theme.css

278 ms

Our browser made a total of 731 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (532 requests) were addressed to the original Charlestonfoodbloggers.com, 6% (42 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 4% (29 requests) were made to Assets-auto.rbl.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Charlestonfoodbloggers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (9%)

Content Size

36.9 MB

After Optimization

33.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Charlestonfoodbloggers.com main page is 36.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 34.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 331.2 kB

  • Original 387.9 kB
  • After minification 382.4 kB
  • After compression 56.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 331.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 34.9 MB
  • After minification 33.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charlestonfoodbloggers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 574.1 kB

  • Original 828.8 kB
  • After minification 723.9 kB
  • After compression 254.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 574.1 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 622.1 kB

  • Original 763.5 kB
  • After minification 731.5 kB
  • After compression 141.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charlestonfoodbloggers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 622.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (12%)

Requests Now

691

After Optimization

607

The browser has sent 691 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charlestonfoodbloggers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

charlestonfoodbloggers.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

charlestonfoodbloggers.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

charlestonfoodbloggers.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charlestonfoodbloggers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Charlestonfoodbloggers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charlestonfoodbloggers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: