Tools & Wizards About Us
charlottesdrapes.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

charlottesdrapes.com

Custom Drapes & Window Treatments in St. Louis | Charlotte's Custom Draperies

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

428 ms

charlottesdrapes.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to charlottesdrapes.com homepage info - get ready to check Charlotte S Drapes best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about charlottesdrapes.com

Choose Charlotte's Custom Draperies for custom drapes and window treatments in St. Louis including expert drapery design and installation services

Visit charlottesdrapes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Charlottesdrapes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

charlottesdrapes.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.168

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

charlottesdrapes.com

84 ms

charlottesdrapes.com

3008 ms

style.min.css

25 ms

styles.css

43 ms

bootstrap.min.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Charlottesdrapes.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Charlottesdrapes.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.8 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Charlottesdrapes.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 43.5 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 56.7 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charlotte S Drapes images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 17.0 kB

  • Original 115.5 kB
  • After minification 115.5 kB
  • After compression 98.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 94.5 kB
  • After minification 94.5 kB
  • After compression 80.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charlottesdrapes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charlotte S Drapes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

charlottesdrapes.com

charlottesdrapes.com

84 ms

charlottesdrapes.com

charlottesdrapes.com

3008 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

25 ms

styles.css

styles.css

43 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

33 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

60 ms

css

css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

43 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

47 ms

style.css

style.css

57 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

52 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

54 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

51 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

119 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

121 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

124 ms

index.js

index.js

122 ms

index.js

index.js

125 ms

morphext.min.js

morphext.min.js

131 ms

welcomebar-front.js

welcomebar-front.js

126 ms

detectmobilebrowser.js

detectmobilebrowser.js

130 ms

mystickymenu.min.js

mystickymenu.min.js

126 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

127 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

131 ms

testimonial.js

testimonial.js

138 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

136 ms

jquery.touchwipe.js

jquery.touchwipe.js

140 ms

js

js

136 ms

00000000000000000000000000000000

00000000000000000000000000000000

78 ms

mo_st-louis_blinds-drapes-window-treatments_2022.svg

mo_st-louis_blinds-drapes-window-treatments_2022.svg

304 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

48 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

147 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

104 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

147 ms

slide-4.jpg

slide-4.jpg

145 ms

slide-5.jpg

slide-5.jpg

148 ms

slide-6.jpg

slide-6.jpg

147 ms

bg_top.jpg

bg_top.jpg

146 ms

logo.png

logo.png

151 ms

houzz_icon.png

houzz_icon.png

150 ms

angies_icon.png

angies_icon.png

149 ms

prev.jpg

prev.jpg

148 ms

next.jpg

next.jpg

151 ms

custom-drapes-1.jpg

custom-drapes-1.jpg

151 ms

custom-drapes-2.jpg

custom-drapes-2.jpg

152 ms

prev.png

prev.png

153 ms

next.png

next.png

152 ms

special.png

special.png

151 ms

houzz-best-of-service-2022.jpg

houzz-best-of-service-2022.jpg

155 ms

houzz-best-of-service-2021.jpg

houzz-best-of-service-2021.jpg

154 ms

houzz-best-of-service-2020.jpg

houzz-best-of-service-2020.jpg

155 ms

houzz-best-of-service-2019.jpg

houzz-best-of-service-2019.jpg

168 ms

raxgHj6Yt9gAN3LLKs0BZVMo8jmwn1-ML5_tclJ_tQ.woff

raxgHj6Yt9gAN3LLKs0BZVMo8jmwn1-ML5_tclJ_tQ.woff

146 ms

raxgHj6Yt9gAN3LLKs0BZVMo8jmwn1-MM5_tclJ_tdyo.woff

raxgHj6Yt9gAN3LLKs0BZVMo8jmwn1-MM5_tclJ_tdyo.woff

197 ms

best-of-houzz-2018.png

best-of-houzz-2018.png

166 ms

houzz-service-award.png

houzz-service-award.png

163 ms

Super-service-2017.png

Super-service-2017.png

162 ms

angies-list-super-service.png

angies-list-super-service.png

163 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

29 ms

old_script-webfont.woff

old_script-webfont.woff

90 ms

Accessibility Review

charlottesdrapes.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

charlottesdrapes.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

charlottesdrapes.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charlottesdrapes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charlottesdrapes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

charlottesdrapes.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Charlotte S Drapes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: