4.8 sec in total
568 ms
3.8 sec
409 ms
Visit charmboard.com now to see the best up-to-date Charmboard content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about charmboard.com
charmboard
Visit charmboard.comWe analyzed Charmboard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 568 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
charmboard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
16/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.111
87/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
568 ms
676 ms
820 ms
59 ms
566 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Charmboard.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Res-2.cloudinary.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Res-5.cloudinary.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Charmboard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 375.7 kB (32%)
1.2 MB
804.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Charmboard.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 750.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charmboard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 116.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 116.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charmboard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 155.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (27%)
26
19
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charmboard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
charmboard.com
568 ms
www.charmboard.com
676 ms
cbms.css
820 ms
icon
59 ms
minified.js
566 ms
pym.js
6 ms
cloudinaryshrink.min.js
624 ms
cloudinary.min.js
335 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
603 ms
material.min.js
20 ms
charmlogo.png
91 ms
charmlogo.png
563 ms
piwik.js
64 ms
main-cmark.jpg
137 ms
social-icons.png
584 ms
2fcrYFNaTjcS6g4U3t-Y5ewrjPiaoEww8AihgqWRJAo.woff
77 ms
116293.jpg
281 ms
114858.jpg
537 ms
97523.jpg
343 ms
71386.jpg
226 ms
62789.jpg
262 ms
71381.jpg
232 ms
47444.jpg
251 ms
46966.jpg
231 ms
91735.jpg
273 ms
47065.jpg
477 ms
46930.jpg
238 ms
47081.jpg
233 ms
myriad-set-pro_ultralight.otf
1383 ms
myriad-set-pro_ultralight.eot
1408 ms
all.js
73 ms
charmboard.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
charmboard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
charmboard.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charmboard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Charmboard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
charmboard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charmboard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: