Tools & Wizards About Us
chartercheck.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

chartercheck.com

Yachtcharter Suche, Partner des ADAC. Segelboote, Yachten

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

743 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

340 ms

chartercheck.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Chartercheck content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chartercheck.com

Yachtcharter Suche, Partner des ADAC. Segelboot mieten & Yacht chartern ✔ Preisvergleich ✔ Sonderangebote ✔ Bewertungen. Buchen oder optionieren - kostenlos

Visit chartercheck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chartercheck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 743 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chartercheck.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chartercheck.com

743 ms

template.css

174 ms

jquery.min.js

255 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

171 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Chartercheck.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Client.sednasystem.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Chartercheck.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 756.4 kB (29%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chartercheck.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 52.0 kB

  • Original 65.5 kB
  • After minification 58.3 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 74.1 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chartercheck images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 378.4 kB

  • Original 539.0 kB
  • After minification 430.6 kB
  • After compression 160.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 378.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 251.9 kB

  • Original 295.4 kB
  • After minification 245.4 kB
  • After compression 43.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chartercheck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 251.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (50%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chartercheck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chartercheck.com

chartercheck.com

743 ms

template.css

template.css

174 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

255 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

171 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

181 ms

caption.js

caption.js

185 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

195 ms

jquery-ui.structure.min.css

jquery-ui.structure.min.css

253 ms

jquery-ui.theme.min.css

jquery-ui.theme.min.css

276 ms

common.css

common.css

367 ms

template.css

template.css

277 ms

searchtemplate.css

searchtemplate.css

291 ms

counter_xhtml.js

counter_xhtml.js

78 ms

shariff.min.js

shariff.min.js

336 ms

jquery.jNice.js

jquery.jNice.js

337 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

518 ms

datepicker-de.js

datepicker-de.js

493 ms

datepicker-en-GB.js

datepicker-en-GB.js

494 ms

datepicker-ru.js

datepicker-ru.js

495 ms

carousel.js

carousel.js

496 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

497 ms

atmosphere.js

atmosphere.js

554 ms

vegas.min.js

vegas.min.js

497 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

515 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

66 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

106 ms

delphia31_test8-250512_pic1.jpg

delphia31_test8-250512_pic1.jpg

595 ms

SBP00.jpg

SBP00.jpg

518 ms

main.jpg

main.jpg

338 ms

26092013103825.JPG

26092013103825.JPG

551 ms

25082011123429.JPG

25082011123429.JPG

629 ms

SBP01.jpg

SBP01.jpg

464 ms

logo.png

logo.png

100 ms

ico-phone.png

ico-phone.png

132 ms

adac.jpg

adac.jpg

211 ms

yacht-pool.png

yacht-pool.png

211 ms

de.gif

de.gif

211 ms

de_at.gif

de_at.gif

210 ms

en.gif

en.gif

228 ms

ru.gif

ru.gif

234 ms

bg-topnav-item.png

bg-topnav-item.png

291 ms

bkg-claimbar.png

bkg-claimbar.png

303 ms

yacht.png

yacht.png

290 ms

segel-journal.png

segel-journal.png

291 ms

ocean-7.png

ocean-7.png

311 ms

ADACMW.PNG

ADACMW.PNG

317 ms

AWN.PNG

AWN.PNG

371 ms

segelfilme.de.png

segelfilme.de.png

372 ms

bkg-feed-request.png

bkg-feed-request.png

371 ms

bkg-feed-rating.png

bkg-feed-rating.png

397 ms

bkg-feed.png

bkg-feed.png

403 ms

DSC_0007_400

DSC_0007_400

682 ms

P1000092_400.JPG

P1000092_400.JPG

617 ms

holland_400.jpg

holland_400.jpg

783 ms

P1010149_400.jpg

P1010149_400.jpg

701 ms

san%20pietro%20la%20bobba.jpg

san%20pietro%20la%20bobba.jpg

690 ms

DSC_0267_bearbeitet_fischer_400.jpg

DSC_0267_bearbeitet_fischer_400.jpg

677 ms

IMG_8633_400.JPG

IMG_8633_400.JPG

784 ms

t.php

t.php

66 ms

tuerkei-landschaft-400.jpg

tuerkei-landschaft-400.jpg

881 ms

DSC_0367_400.jpg

DSC_0367_400.jpg

881 ms

redstroke.png

redstroke.png

716 ms

bkg-feed-newsletter.png

bkg-feed-newsletter.png

713 ms

logoDreamYachtCharter.jpg

logoDreamYachtCharter.jpg

791 ms

SunCharter.png

SunCharter.png

792 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

795 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

Pitter.png

Pitter.png

801 ms

SEDNA.jpg

SEDNA.jpg

842 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

99 ms

Yachtbooer.png

Yachtbooer.png

842 ms

nausys_logo_w175.jpg

nausys_logo_w175.jpg

827 ms

69 ms

ico-facebook.png

ico-facebook.png

781 ms

payment.png

payment.png

828 ms

ico-calendar.png

ico-calendar.png

828 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

1596 ms

37 ms

45 ms

main.jpg

main.jpg

592 ms

Accessibility Review

chartercheck.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chartercheck.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chartercheck.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chartercheck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chartercheck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chartercheck.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chartercheck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: