8.4 sec in total
695 ms
7.2 sec
521 ms
Click here to check amazing Chasefuture content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chasefuture.com
ChaseFuture connects you to students, alumni, and admissions officers from your target university. Expert mentors provide tailored VIP service and customized strategies to help you earn admission to y...
Visit chasefuture.comWe analyzed Chasefuture.com page load time and found that the first response time was 695 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
chasefuture.com performance score
695 ms
358 ms
664 ms
1665 ms
997 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Chasefuture.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Chasefuture.com.
Page size can be reduced by 577.8 kB (34%)
1.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Chasefuture.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 127.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chasefuture needs image optimization as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 274.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chasefuture.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 274.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (16%)
56
47
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chasefuture. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chasefuture.com
695 ms
en
358 ms
font-awesome.min.css
664 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1665 ms
global_v2.min.css
997 ms
intlTelInput.css
1003 ms
ihover.min.css
1679 ms
home.min.css
1011 ms
jquery.min.js
1656 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1670 ms
global_v2.min.js
1322 ms
intlTelInput.min.js
1730 ms
logoen_2x.png
1669 ms
Brianne_Kent.png
2331 ms
Clara_Spera.jpeg
1995 ms
Peter_Williams.jpeg
1994 ms
Kevin_Nead.jpeg
2333 ms
Danyal_Sheikh.png
2667 ms
Alberto_Puggelli.jpeg
2025 ms
Tarun_Kapoor.jpeg
2331 ms
Fanchao_Meng.jpeg
2332 ms
Jonathan_Chang.jpeg
2698 ms
Trina_Fletcher.jpeg
2658 ms
Kaylen_James.jpeg
2659 ms
Columbia.png
2660 ms
LSE.png
2661 ms
CMU.png
2986 ms
Imperial.png
2987 ms
NYU.png
2989 ms
UChicago.png
2990 ms
USC.png
2991 ms
UPenn.png
3027 ms
UCL.png
3315 ms
Hopkins.png
3316 ms
MIT.png
3317 ms
UCLA.png
3318 ms
weforum-logo.2x.png
3322 ms
Sing_Tao_Daily_logo.png
3363 ms
media-logo-4.jpg
3003 ms
media-logo-5.jpg
2671 ms
media-logo-6.jpg
2667 ms
Huffington_Post_logo.png
2662 ms
media-logo-7.jpg
2350 ms
media-logo-8.jpg
2061 ms
media-logo-9.jpg
2331 ms
media-logo-13.png
2333 ms
media-logo-14.png
2304 ms
media-logo-15.png
2276 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
opensans.woff
2251 ms
collect
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2406 ms
ewm.jpg
2679 ms
acamis.png
2312 ms
icon-nav.gif
2009 ms
home-banner.jpg
3024 ms
home-icon-jt.png
2015 ms
home-banner-bottom.jpg
2680 ms
icon_globel.png
2017 ms
flags.png
2026 ms
chasefuture.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chasefuture.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Chasefuture.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chasefuture.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chasefuture. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: