Tools & Wizards About Us
chasepeople.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

chasepeople.com

CHASE | Maximising UK potential for organisations and individuals in life-sciences and NHS | CHASE

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

175 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

875 ms

chasepeople.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chasepeople.com homepage info - get ready to check CHASE People best content right away, or after learning these important things about chasepeople.com

We are a leading provider of outsourced commercial, medical and recruitment services to UK pharmaceutical, biotech and healthcare companies.

Visit chasepeople.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chasepeople.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chasepeople.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,060 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chasepeople.com

175 ms

chasepeople.com

344 ms

www.chasepeople.com

387 ms

f4107c350f9517a333ce8a5d91beefe5.js

456 ms

js

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Chasepeople.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Chasepeople.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (26%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chasepeople.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 43.9 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 900.1 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CHASE People needs image optimization as it can save up to 900.1 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 64.5 kB

  • Original 321.6 kB
  • After minification 321.6 kB
  • After compression 257.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 47.9 kB
  • After minification 47.9 kB
  • After compression 47.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chasepeople.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (23%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CHASE People. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chasepeople.com

chasepeople.com

175 ms

chasepeople.com

chasepeople.com

344 ms

www.chasepeople.com

www.chasepeople.com

387 ms

f4107c350f9517a333ce8a5d91beefe5.js

f4107c350f9517a333ce8a5d91beefe5.js

456 ms

js

js

64 ms

js

js

109 ms

25855687.js

25855687.js

429 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

global.min.css

global.min.css

164 ms

global.min.js

global.min.js

530 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

527 ms

hotjar-3875815.js

hotjar-3875815.js

296 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

508 ms

25855687.js

25855687.js

519 ms

fb.js

fb.js

500 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

524 ms

banner.js

banner.js

520 ms

chaseLogo.svg

chaseLogo.svg

102 ms

hompage-banner.jpg

hompage-banner.jpg

359 ms

gettyimages-1062184620.jpg

gettyimages-1062184620.jpg

268 ms

gettyimages-1062184620.jpg

gettyimages-1062184620.jpg

363 ms

shutterstock_1694214232.jpg

shutterstock_1694214232.jpg

640 ms

shutterstock_1694214232.jpg

shutterstock_1694214232.jpg

569 ms

shutterstock_1818645209-1.jpg

shutterstock_1818645209-1.jpg

639 ms

shutterstock_1818645209-1.jpg

shutterstock_1818645209-1.jpg

558 ms

shutterstock_1729510321-1.jpg

shutterstock_1729510321-1.jpg

539 ms

shutterstock_1729510321-1.jpg

shutterstock_1729510321-1.jpg

452 ms

shutterstock_1068519821-2.jpg

shutterstock_1068519821-2.jpg

552 ms

gettyimages-492688421.jpg

gettyimages-492688421.jpg

610 ms

graham.png

graham.png

626 ms

emma-b.png

emma-b.png

969 ms

danny-mack.png

danny-mack.png

970 ms

amanda.png

amanda.png

776 ms

danny-w.png

danny-w.png

717 ms

cat-m.png

cat-m.png

965 ms

ross.png

ross.png

889 ms

kelly.png

kelly.png

801 ms

4.png

4.png

865 ms

10.png

10.png

889 ms

15.png

15.png

953 ms

17.png

17.png

971 ms

37.png

37.png

972 ms

38.png

38.png

1041 ms

45.png

45.png

1046 ms

50.png

50.png

1060 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

117 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

163 ms

Chase.ttf

Chase.ttf

940 ms

tracker.js

tracker.js

191 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

874 ms

Accessibility Review

chasepeople.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chasepeople.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

chasepeople.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chasepeople.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chasepeople.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chasepeople.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CHASE People. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: