22.8 sec in total
510 ms
21.4 sec
964 ms
Visit chatbible.com now to see the best up-to-date Chat Bible content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chatbible.com
ASV (1901); Hebrew Names KJV (1769/1611); Greek LXX (Brenton); Aramaic NT (Etheridge/Murdock) Jamieson-Fausset-Brown (1871); John Wesley (1765); Matthew Henry (1721); Geneva Bible Notes (1599); Pop-up...
Visit chatbible.comWe analyzed Chatbible.com page load time and found that the first response time was 510 ms and then it took 22.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
chatbible.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value540 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.161
72/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
510 ms
196 ms
575 ms
183 ms
611 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Chatbible.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Firstgospel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 239.0 kB (41%)
586.4 kB
347.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Chatbible.com main page is 586.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 470.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chat Bible needs image optimization as it can save up to 21 B or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 152.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 152.5 kB or 32% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chatbible.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (60%)
52
21
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chat Bible. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
chatbible.com
510 ms
main.css
196 ms
menu.css
575 ms
qtip.js
183 ms
p.js
611 ms
v.js
566 ms
menu.js
577 ms
show_ads.js
78 ms
000.js
606 ms
all.js
20 ms
ads-vertical.asp
20259 ms
_quo.gif
703 ms
_quor.gif
712 ms
_new.gif
1780 ms
_c36.gif
699 ms
adsbygoogle.js
167 ms
267.js
37 ms
073.js
628 ms
show_ads_impl.js
387 ms
zrt_lookup.html
25 ms
ads
492 ms
ads
173 ms
ads
600 ms
004.js
1027 ms
120.js
593 ms
158.js
169 ms
384.js
426 ms
100.js
1252 ms
115.js
616 ms
376.js
615 ms
008.js
491 ms
261.js
1199 ms
029.js
701 ms
comment.asp
1048 ms
all.js
53 ms
01-gen-001-001.asp
1039 ms
01-gen-001-001.asp
589 ms
92 ms
fbs.gif
459 ms
nav-ppp.gif
84 ms
nav-pp.gif
62 ms
nav-p.gif
78 ms
nav-n.gif
79 ms
nav-nn.gif
82 ms
nav-nnn.gif
637 ms
search1.gif
127 ms
search2.gif
2407 ms
search3.gif
634 ms
search4.gif
151 ms
search5.gif
131 ms
search6.gif
604 ms
search7.gif
607 ms
search8.gif
604 ms
fb.gif
648 ms
chatbible.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
chatbible.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
chatbible.com SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chatbible.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chatbible.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
chatbible.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chat Bible. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: