Tools & Wizards About Us
chec.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

chec.io

Headless Commerce for Businesses | Commerce.js

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

935 ms

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

chec.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Chec content for Morocco. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chec.io

Headless eCommerce for growing businesses. Compose your business with best of breed tools to deliver the best customer and purchasing expeirences.

Visit chec.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Chec.io page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chec.io performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chec.io

111 ms

commercejs.com

179 ms

css

58 ms

devicon.min.css

66 ms

7b1aee1.css

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chec.io, 42% (16 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net and 37% (14 requests) were made to Commercejs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) relates to the external source Commercejs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 74.0 kB (2%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Chec.io main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

  • Original 63.4 kB
  • After minification 61.6 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chec images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (43%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chec.io

chec.io

111 ms

commercejs.com

commercejs.com

179 ms

css

css

58 ms

devicon.min.css

devicon.min.css

66 ms

7b1aee1.css

7b1aee1.css

158 ms

4938fab.css

4938fab.css

286 ms

e994313.css

e994313.css

375 ms

df32983.css

df32983.css

67 ms

7f56d30.css

7f56d30.css

84 ms

Hermarketingsite-min.png

Hermarketingsite-min.png

41 ms

state.js

state.js

91 ms

533e586.js

533e586.js

85 ms

948b057.js

948b057.js

152 ms

5fabdc3.js

5fabdc3.js

376 ms

1e88b36.js

1e88b36.js

375 ms

29e8a18.js

29e8a18.js

381 ms

13e7efe.js

13e7efe.js

515 ms

9704911.js

9704911.js

374 ms

logl_3.png

logl_3.png

41 ms

logl_1.png

logl_1.png

48 ms

logl_6.png

logl_6.png

46 ms

logl2.png

logl2.png

44 ms

logl_4.png

logl_4.png

47 ms

logl_5.png

logl_5.png

48 ms

optional__1_.png

optional__1_.png

46 ms

saleshome__1_.png

saleshome__1_.png

60 ms

integrationshime__1_.png

integrationshime__1_.png

57 ms

dashboard_home__1_.png

dashboard_home__1_.png

51 ms

L_G__1_.png

L_G__1_.png

68 ms

Whollyveggie__1_.png

Whollyveggie__1_.png

60 ms

iraconcept__2_.png

iraconcept__2_.png

69 ms

Blume__2_.png

Blume__2_.png

67 ms

ReidReid_devices__2_.png

ReidReid_devices__2_.png

69 ms

devicon.min.css

devicon.min.css

28 ms

css2

css2

226 ms

css2

css2

239 ms

font

font

17 ms

font

font

59 ms

Accessibility Review

chec.io accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

chec.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

chec.io SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chec.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chec.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chec.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: