984 ms in total
43 ms
667 ms
274 ms
Visit checkerflag.biz now to see the best up-to-date Checker Flag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about checkerflag.biz
For quality oil changes or emissions and safety inspections in Lehi, UT, residents visit Checker Flag. Click here to read more about our services!
Visit checkerflag.bizWe analyzed Checkerflag.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 941 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
checkerflag.biz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.368
29/100
15%
Value12.4 s
14/100
10%
43 ms
25 ms
35 ms
43 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Checkerflag.biz, 39% (16 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 39% (16 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (548 ms) relates to the external source Nebula.wsimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 347.1 kB (5%)
7.6 MB
7.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Checkerflag.biz main page is 7.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checker Flag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 206.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 206.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkerflag.biz has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (48%)
40
21
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checker Flag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.checkerflag.biz
43 ms
site.css
25 ms
mapbox-gl.css
35 ms
mapbox-gl.js
43 ms
duel.js
41 ms
jq.js
16 ms
analytics.js
44 ms
17790178ae4067a49edc3837785bd14a
548 ms
facebookSDKHelper.js
11 ms
mapbox.js
29 ms
media.gallery.js
28 ms
cookiemanager.js
30 ms
iebackground.js
36 ms
441313a2679fd4c8380e5454ed933653
77 ms
b5f102260597d3158b49b53575c0cc30
420 ms
3d6e1e3a70075f1b7ed3219dbc176553
81 ms
47b81064b61049edca231d3eae3868fd
79 ms
8d8a95332f86c8236221673fa9eb29a0
156 ms
2bf9138ddce4a2376d74c28a3a0cba3e
79 ms
e0fdfef8fab3f8747345dc573a313e54
81 ms
0eb1f176e4fe25eff72c9d972d3d36f9
324 ms
aa23c070e05154c845016ee6a7ada3f9
233 ms
5db67a1b80f1cb5711cda99d8e8209ee
342 ms
scc-c2.min.js
32 ms
util.fbSDKLoader.js
15 ms
util.window.js
17 ms
util.instances.js
5 ms
util.model.js
49 ms
documentHelper.js
48 ms
helper.js
47 ms
growl.js
45 ms
collect
22 ms
browser.js
10 ms
sf.core.pkg.js
26 ms
b8734386cdd4b00f3a946a0bc612f836
111 ms
js
85 ms
app.css
22 ms
5365d2e5de51d49117a438a9308ec3af
26 ms
217aee5f2432870f082e6dabcae4d9e1
47 ms
d537d31088a65739677035c4d24f262b
44 ms
6b81524af105e56ccddef974f806f3dd
65 ms
checkerflag.biz accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
checkerflag.biz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
checkerflag.biz SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkerflag.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkerflag.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
checkerflag.biz
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Checker Flag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: