Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

checkers.ws

Checkers Online and other Board Games Online. Play free internet checkers

Page Load Speed

734 ms in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

390 ms

Page Rendered

173 ms

checkers.ws screenshot

About Website

Visit checkers.ws now to see the best up-to-date Checkers content for Chile and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about checkers.ws

Checkers Online, chinese checkers and other free board games to play in the internet: Othello, reversi, go, mahjong, chess, gomoku, connect 4, hexxagon. Games for two players or play solitaire against...

Visit checkers.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkers.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 563 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkers.ws performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,080 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkers.ws

171 ms

ga.js

7 ms

show_ads.js

68 ms

checkers.gif

58 ms

pubcode.min.js

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Checkers.ws, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (171 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkers.ws.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.0 kB (25%)

Content Size

145.8 kB

After Optimization

108.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Checkers.ws main page is 145.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 106.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 30.9 kB

  • Original 37.8 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 21 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checkers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 106.8 kB
  • After minification 106.8 kB
  • After compression 100.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (59%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

checkers.ws accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

checkers.ws best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

checkers.ws SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkers.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Checkers.ws main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Checkers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: