Tools & Wizards About Us
checkerwrecker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

checkerwrecker.com

Checker Wrecker, Towing, Roadside, Jumpstarts, Tire Change, Lockouts

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

65 ms

checkerwrecker.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Checker Wrecker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about checkerwrecker.com

Checker Wrecker Service provides 24 Hour Light, Medium, and Heavy Towing and Roadside Assistance in the Lawton, Oklahoma area!

Visit checkerwrecker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkerwrecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkerwrecker.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,040 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.checkerwrecker.com

96 ms

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

77 ms

polyfill.min.js

31 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1df9637b.bundle.min.js

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Checkerwrecker.com, 40% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (13 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (635 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 444.5 kB (49%)

Content Size

909.6 kB

After Optimization

465.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Checkerwrecker.com main page is 909.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 423.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 312.3 kB

  • Original 423.1 kB
  • After minification 421.5 kB
  • After compression 110.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 312.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 84.1 kB

  • Original 179.8 kB
  • After minification 95.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Checker Wrecker needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 306.7 kB
  • After minification 306.7 kB
  • After compression 258.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (28%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checker Wrecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.checkerwrecker.com

www.checkerwrecker.com

96 ms

minified.js

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

77 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

31 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1df9637b.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1df9637b.bundle.min.js

110 ms

main.4310c786.bundle.min.js

main.4310c786.bundle.min.js

131 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

109 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

114 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

109 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

115 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

130 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

113 ms

7ce95a8a246f3166e1d54164b19436b3.wix_mp

7ce95a8a246f3166e1d54164b19436b3.wix_mp

73 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

63 ms

ef244f_8f8c761b5bc3a88176780a34f31c9447.jpg

ef244f_8f8c761b5bc3a88176780a34f31c9447.jpg

395 ms

ef244f_cbe7f4bf2ff04656aa80597d090e6bf9.jpg

ef244f_cbe7f4bf2ff04656aa80597d090e6bf9.jpg

227 ms

ef244f_96a4b24a252740b79f3b553635d6d6d9.jpg

ef244f_96a4b24a252740b79f3b553635d6d6d9.jpg

281 ms

ef244f_4d61be8b660148daadf7e288e86d0593.jpg

ef244f_4d61be8b660148daadf7e288e86d0593.jpg

247 ms

ef244f_903ac1dd0c43f6800154a3d2b563c5ae.jpg

ef244f_903ac1dd0c43f6800154a3d2b563c5ae.jpg

310 ms

ef244f_efbbc5524bb22a98ad819cf3c9d14d57.jpg

ef244f_efbbc5524bb22a98ad819cf3c9d14d57.jpg

334 ms

ef244f_21c78285b70462457a8d85c590f889e2.jpg

ef244f_21c78285b70462457a8d85c590f889e2.jpg

420 ms

ef244f_c4eb1914c5ff0120f58120a51861b663.jpg

ef244f_c4eb1914c5ff0120f58120a51861b663.jpg

635 ms

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

ironpatern.84ec58ff.png

52 ms

99 ms

100 ms

98 ms

112 ms

111 ms

110 ms

131 ms

137 ms

137 ms

146 ms

146 ms

144 ms

165 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

14 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

29 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

9 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

14 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

10 ms

Accessibility Review

checkerwrecker.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

checkerwrecker.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

checkerwrecker.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkerwrecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkerwrecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

checkerwrecker.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Checker Wrecker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: