Tools & Wizards About Us
checkip.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

checkip.com

checkip.com - This website is for sale! - checkip Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

196 ms

checkip.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Checkip content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about checkip.com

This website is for sale! checkip.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, checkip.com has it...

Visit checkip.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkip.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.208

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkip.com

185 ms

www.checkip.com

521 ms

bootstrap.dev.css

169 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

182 ms

style.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Checkip.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 13% (12 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (790 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkip.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 846.5 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

900.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Checkip.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 890.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 23.9 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 139.2 kB

  • Original 678.6 kB
  • After minification 539.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Checkip needs image optimization as it can save up to 139.2 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 558.1 kB

  • Original 890.1 kB
  • After minification 890.0 kB
  • After compression 331.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 558.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 131.0 kB

  • Original 154.3 kB
  • After minification 129.2 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkip.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (59%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

checkip.com

checkip.com

185 ms

www.checkip.com

www.checkip.com

521 ms

bootstrap.dev.css

bootstrap.dev.css

169 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

182 ms

style.css

style.css

185 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

253 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

188 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

5 ms

ga.js

ga.js

21 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

790 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

84 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

45 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

49 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

105 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

104 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

109 ms

maps

maps

46 ms

ca-pub-7875048284016469.js

ca-pub-7875048284016469.js

126 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

124 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

55 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

23 ms

embed

embed

120 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

138 ms

atrk.gif

atrk.gif

99 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

90 ms

ads

ads

251 ms

osd.js

osd.js

33 ms

all.js

all.js

118 ms

ads

ads

253 ms

ads

ads

237 ms

test.png

test.png

236 ms

js

js

106 ms

init_embed.js

init_embed.js

121 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

58 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

71 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

143 ms

194 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

161 ms

8345931236332454120

8345931236332454120

182 ms

abg.js

abg.js

182 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

200 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

195 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

76 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

77 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

129 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

246 ms

9908927743990385658

9908927743990385658

166 ms

common.js

common.js

58 ms

map.js

map.js

100 ms

google4.png

google4.png

70 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

70 ms

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

162 ms

api.js

api.js

122 ms

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js

234 ms

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

2536007149-postmessagerelay.js

163 ms

util.js

util.js

106 ms

onion.js

onion.js

42 ms

stats.js

stats.js

104 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

79 ms

controls.js

controls.js

72 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

87 ms

s

s

63 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

68 ms

favicon

favicon

211 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

67 ms

7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js

7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js

116 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

125 ms

css

css

173 ms

entity11.png

entity11.png

146 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

77 ms

kh

kh

73 ms

vt

vt

63 ms

vt

vt

57 ms

vt

vt

54 ms

vt

vt

70 ms

vt

vt

67 ms

vt

vt

68 ms

vt

vt

73 ms

vt

vt

71 ms

vt

vt

78 ms

vt

vt

82 ms

tmapctrl.png

tmapctrl.png

61 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

45 ms

ping

ping

40 ms

ui

ui

35 ms

like.php

like.php

53 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

15 ms

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

vpc6VNjRPXV.js

129 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

140 ms

Accessibility Review

checkip.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

checkip.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

checkip.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Checkip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

checkip.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Checkip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: