Access checkmark.com. CheckMark – Delivering Business Software Since 1984

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

checkmark.com

131 ms

www.checkmark.com

645 ms

css

113 ms

usweb.css

264 ms

usresponsive.css

293 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Checkmark.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (645 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkmark.com.

Content Size

844.2 kB

After Optimization

480.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Checkmark.com main page is 844.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 67.1 kB

Original 81.2 kB
After minification 59.8 kB
After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.4 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 127.4 kB

Original 399.2 kB
After minification 271.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Check Mark needs image optimization as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 122.2 kB

Original 260.4 kB
After minification 260.4 kB
After compression 138.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 46.6 kB

Original 103.4 kB
After minification 103.4 kB
After compression 56.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 45% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Check Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

checkmark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Check Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

CheckMark – Delivering Business Software Since 1984

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

checkmark.com

www.checkmark.com

css

usweb.css

usresponsive.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

checkmark.com

www.checkmark.com

css

usweb.css

usresponsive.css

jquery

font-awesome.min.css

usweball.js

jqueryui.js

PageValidations.js

Loading.css

Messages.js

jquery-3.1.1.js

cartproducts.js

cartproductzoom.js

js

slickslider.js

bootstrap

css

fbevents.js

bat.js

d2dnx1yh1o

cmlogo.png

downarrow.png

CheckMark%20Online%20Payroll%20Icon.png

payroll-icon.png

ml-icon.png

1099-icon.png

1095-icon.png

checks-icon.png

business-icon.png

tax-icon.png

cloud-icon.png

hrser-icon.png

timeser-icon.png

home.png

softicon.png

update.png

bundle.png

checkenvelopeicon.png

businessformicon.png

taxformicon.png

hrsupporticon.png