9.3 sec in total
467 ms
8.1 sec
752 ms
Click here to check amazing Check Mark content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about checkmark.nl
CheckMark heeft een groot netwerk aan opdrachtgevers binnen de chemie, biotech, food en farma. Hierdoor beschikken we over een uitgebreid vacatureaanbod.
Visit checkmark.nlWe analyzed Checkmark.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 467 ms and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
checkmark.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value18.1 s
0/100
10%
Value23,040 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.046
99/100
15%
Value31.1 s
0/100
10%
467 ms
3189 ms
303 ms
181 ms
307 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Checkmark.nl, 5% (6 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Checkmark.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 582.9 kB (36%)
1.6 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Checkmark.nl main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 724.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Check Mark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 448.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkmark.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 448.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (44%)
108
60
The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Check Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
checkmark.nl
467 ms
checkmark.nl
3189 ms
gtm.js
303 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
181 ms
FormGen.css
307 ms
jquery-ui.css
481 ms
main.css
396 ms
style.css
489 ms
style.min.css
578 ms
styles.css
363 ms
css
140 ms
genericons.css
361 ms
style.css
706 ms
shortcodes.css
451 ms
grey.css
455 ms
js_composer.min.css
875 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
555 ms
dashicons.min.css
627 ms
jquery.min.js
721 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
637 ms
FormGen.js
635 ms
main.js
718 ms
icheck.js
726 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
728 ms
js
151 ms
core.min.js
769 ms
datepicker.min.js
787 ms
script.js
787 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
793 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
795 ms
index.js
1104 ms
functions.js
1090 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1094 ms
api.js
134 ms
index.js
1103 ms
video_js.js
1104 ms
analytics.js
50 ms
collect
43 ms
collect
50 ms
ga-audiences
38 ms
Checkmark-Logo.png
230 ms
nl.png
230 ms
en.png
228 ms
IMG_1391_1x1-1.jpg
246 ms
1845_1x1.jpg
226 ms
IMG_13851x1.jpg
244 ms
Untitled-4.jpg
1235 ms
IMG_17061x1.jpg
1235 ms
Untitled-6.jpg
1237 ms
IMG_1552_1x2.jpg
1235 ms
magenta-background.jpg
1236 ms
home-header-filter-background.jpg
1234 ms
play-button.png
1332 ms
Foto_Tamara-blog-353x235.jpg
1349 ms
Copyright-Raymond-Wennekes-SDDNZS-Expeditie-Zuid-2022_08_low-res-353x235.jpg
1330 ms
Checkmark-labrecruitment4-353x235.jpg
1350 ms
P1130282-scaled-353x235.jpg
1329 ms
P1130257-scaled-353x235.jpg
1328 ms
footer-logo-checkmark.png
1690 ms
NEN-4400-1.png
1689 ms
sna.png
1689 ms
nbbu.png
1688 ms
footer-facebook.png
1693 ms
footer-linkedin.png
1693 ms
footer-twitter.png
1695 ms
footer-instagram.png
1696 ms
abbott.png
1695 ms
akzo.png
1693 ms
alcami.png
1696 ms
astellas-new-3.png
1698 ms
fbevents.js
237 ms
insight.min.js
1221 ms
d3e09291-fe46-4493-9379-15c4e935d806.js
1213 ms
dsm.png
1554 ms
genmab.png
1548 ms
Intertek-Caleb-Brett-horizontaal.png
1544 ms
janssen.png
1535 ms
msd.png
1535 ms
sgs.png
1533 ms
HelveticaNeue-Light.woff
1577 ms
HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff
1577 ms
HelveticaNeue-MediumCond.woff
1470 ms
shell.png
1470 ms
tno.png
1470 ms
home-video.jpg
1570 ms
recaptcha__en.js
410 ms
gen_204
196 ms
431261227632308
469 ms
home-4.jpg
569 ms
1842_1x1.jpg
569 ms
pattern_bg_light.jpg
579 ms
16-CheckMark-1631_35_-small-blackwhite.jpg
1039 ms
IMG_17061x1.jpg
1036 ms
home-4.jpg
1034 ms
asset_composer.js
456 ms
1-Laboratorium-vacatures_1564_1000x600.jpg
996 ms
bx_loader.gif
943 ms
controls.png
943 ms
common.js
68 ms
util.js
529 ms
controls.js
528 ms
places_impl.js
528 ms
anchor
232 ms
4El2RmCOOVb7qvd5txtNaKgnFY96oyOU
467 ms
styles__ltr.css
58 ms
recaptcha__en.js
102 ms
powered-by-google-on-white3.png
342 ms
autocomplete-icons.png
347 ms
webworker.js
193 ms
logo_48.png
144 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
498 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
522 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
523 ms
recaptcha__en.js
393 ms
widget_v2.334.js
149 ms
143 ms
checkmark.nl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
checkmark.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
checkmark.nl SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkmark.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkmark.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
checkmark.nl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Check Mark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: