Tools & Wizards About Us
checkmarkplus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

checkmarkplus.com

Home - Residential Inspections Service in Bergen County New Jersey

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

109 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

checkmarkplus.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to checkmarkplus.com homepage info - get ready to check Checkmarkplus best content right away, or after learning these important things about checkmarkplus.com

COVID-19 GUIDELINESA home inspection is a vital part of a home purchase. We are certified by InterNACHIs to perform home inspection following

Visit checkmarkplus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkmarkplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkmarkplus.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,830 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkmarkplus.com

109 ms

checkmarkplus.com

187 ms

www.checkmarkplus.com

59 ms

www.checkmarkplus.com

82 ms

css

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Checkmarkplus.com, 12% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (362 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 372.5 kB (55%)

Content Size

678.1 kB

After Optimization

305.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Checkmarkplus.com main page is 678.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 417.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 371.4 kB

  • Original 417.9 kB
  • After minification 417.9 kB
  • After compression 46.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 371.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checkmarkplus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 218.1 kB
  • After minification 218.1 kB
  • After compression 217.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 89 (97%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkmarkplus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

checkmarkplus.com

checkmarkplus.com

109 ms

checkmarkplus.com

checkmarkplus.com

187 ms

www.checkmarkplus.com

www.checkmarkplus.com

59 ms

www.checkmarkplus.com

www.checkmarkplus.com

82 ms

css

css

72 ms

tooltipster.css

tooltipster.css

49 ms

tooltipster-light.css

tooltipster-light.css

45 ms

animations.css

animations.css

56 ms

booked.css

booked.css

89 ms

style.css

style.css

75 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

73 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

62 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

84 ms

pannellum.css

pannellum.css

70 ms

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

tooltipster.bundle.min.css

94 ms

tooltipster-sideTip-borderless.min.css

tooltipster-sideTip-borderless.min.css

95 ms

tooltipster-sideTip-light.min.css

tooltipster-sideTip-light.min.css

97 ms

tooltipster-sideTip-noir.min.css

tooltipster-sideTip-noir.min.css

97 ms

tooltipster-sideTip-punk.min.css

tooltipster-sideTip-punk.min.css

95 ms

tooltipster-sideTip-shadow.min.css

tooltipster-sideTip-shadow.min.css

104 ms

perfect-scrollbar.css

perfect-scrollbar.css

106 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

101 ms

loaders.min.css

loaders.min.css

97 ms

wvt-frontend.css

wvt-frontend.css

104 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

101 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

105 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

106 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

107 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

135 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

106 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

105 ms

frontend-style.css

frontend-style.css

100 ms

name-your-price.css

name-your-price.css

109 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

120 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

115 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

125 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

124 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

137 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

148 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

147 ms

js

js

108 ms

element.js

element.js

74 ms

api.js

api.js

73 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

141 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

126 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

121 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

112 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

101 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

97 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

86 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

87 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

87 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

84 ms

frontend-functions.js

frontend-functions.js

87 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

83 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

319 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

317 ms

spin.min.js

spin.min.js

320 ms

spin.jquery.js

spin.jquery.js

317 ms

jquery.tooltipster.min.js

jquery.tooltipster.min.js

313 ms

functions.js

functions.js

316 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

316 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

314 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

315 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

313 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

333 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

313 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

314 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

311 ms

tooltipster.bundle.min.js

tooltipster.bundle.min.js

310 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

308 ms

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

305 ms

wvt-frontend.min.js

wvt-frontend.min.js

295 ms

RequestAnimationFrame.js

RequestAnimationFrame.js

294 ms

libpannellum.js

libpannellum.js

297 ms

pannellum.js

pannellum.js

282 ms

functions.js

functions.js

273 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

274 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

274 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

275 ms

index.js

index.js

271 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

270 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

273 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

270 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

270 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

276 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

271 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

266 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

265 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

262 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

46 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

46 ms

elementor.frontend.js

elementor.frontend.js

42 ms

flags18.png

flags18.png

43 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

225 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

269 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

270 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

269 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

269 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

270 ms

kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxY.ttf

kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxY.ttf

268 ms

kmKiZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qviTgY3KcU.ttf

kmKiZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qviTgY3KcU.ttf

273 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

263 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

263 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

261 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

272 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

273 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

273 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

271 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

272 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

362 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

261 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

234 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

99 ms

Accessibility Review

checkmarkplus.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

checkmarkplus.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

checkmarkplus.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkmarkplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkmarkplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

checkmarkplus.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Checkmarkplus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: