2.2 sec in total
53 ms
637 ms
1.5 sec
Visit checkrecipient.com now to see the best up-to-date Checkrecipient content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about checkrecipient.com
A behavioral based approach to preventing advanced threats and protecting against data loss on email.
Visit checkrecipient.comWe analyzed Checkrecipient.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
checkrecipient.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value21.6 s
1/100
10%
53 ms
105 ms
35 ms
29 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Checkrecipient.com, 89% (77 requests) were made to Tessian.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (278 ms) relates to the external source Tessian.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (12%)
9.2 MB
8.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Checkrecipient.com main page is 9.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Checkrecipient needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 242 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 270 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkrecipient.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (37%)
82
52
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkrecipient. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
checkrecipient.com
53 ms
www.tessian.com
105 ms
foundation.min.css
35 ms
motion-ui.min.css
29 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
19 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
27 ms
style.css
22 ms
css2
33 ms
style.min.css
28 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
40 ms
19y57ax7y0.jsonp
30 ms
E-v1.js
67 ms
jquery.min.js
56 ms
what-input.min.js
22 ms
foundation.min.js
131 ms
motion-ui.min.js
129 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
127 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
127 ms
main.js
128 ms
complianz.min.js
129 ms
sl.js
157 ms
logo-header.svg
135 ms
header-logo-no-words.svg
133 ms
Defend_Logo.svg
135 ms
Protect_Logo.svg
131 ms
Respond_Logo.svg
136 ms
Coach_Logo.svg
130 ms
AMR-1-150x150.png
161 ms
MarketingWebsite2023-10-Platform-Brochure-featured-image-800x800-1-150x150.png
278 ms
WebsiteResources2022-01-Microsoft-1-150x150.jpeg
146 ms
WebsiteResources2022-08-Customer-Story-CSK-1-150x150.jpg
146 ms
WebsiteResources2021-09-Rand-Merchant-Bank-150x150.jpg
146 ms
website-thumbnail-150x150.png
146 ms
bg-intro-section.png
174 ms
Arm.svg
159 ms
Permira.svg
158 ms
Marathon-Asset-Management.svg
156 ms
KL-Gates.svg
166 ms
Bracewell.svg
168 ms
BDO.svg
170 ms
Bain-Capital.svg
169 ms
Birketts.svg
176 ms
Klarna.svg
179 ms
RealPage.svg
177 ms
Stanford-University.svg
182 ms
Sanne.svg
272 ms
logo-stats.png
277 ms
IBM.svg
273 ms
Ponemon.svg
275 ms
Home-Tessian-1.png
269 ms
1596278155828-150x150.jpeg
266 ms
Glow-BG.jpg
205 ms
Home-Tessian-2.png
208 ms
Subtract-e1699292847568.png
206 ms
Subtract-1-e1699292867540.png
205 ms
Subtract-2-e1699292885518.png
163 ms
Subtract-3-e1699292902489.png
163 ms
Ventra-Health.svg
154 ms
LGL-Group.svg
155 ms
Slide1-764x1024.png
155 ms
Slide2-764x1024.png
153 ms
Slide3-764x1024.png
154 ms
Slide4-764x1024.png
154 ms
r
18 ms
bg-sticky-section-1.png
146 ms
bg-sticky-section-2.png
154 ms
Slide1.png
147 ms
Slide2.png
148 ms
i
6 ms
Slide3.png
136 ms
Slide4.png
133 ms
bg-section-centered.png
137 ms
Marchitecture.png
135 ms
Screenshot-2023-11-09-at-8.58.27-AM-150x150.png
129 ms
Screenshot-2023-11-09-at-8.58.57-AM-150x150.png
127 ms
Screenshot-2023-11-09-at-8.59.20-AM.png
126 ms
Screenshot-2023-11-09-at-8.59.47-AM-150x150.png
127 ms
Screenshot-2023-11-09-at-9.01.39-AM-150x150.png
124 ms
Screenshot-2023-11-09-at-9.02.16-AM-150x150.png
124 ms
Screenshot-2023-11-09-at-9.02.53-AM-150x150.png
121 ms
CTA-Hero.png
119 ms
icon-play-video.png
29 ms
WebsiteResources2023-03-TessianMicrosoft-365-Guide-768x768.png
29 ms
WebsiteResources2022-07-Total-Economic-Impact-768x768.png
28 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
22 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
69 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf
70 ms
checkrecipient.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
checkrecipient.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
checkrecipient.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkrecipient.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkrecipient.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
checkrecipient.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Checkrecipient. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: