4.3 sec in total
475 ms
3.6 sec
142 ms
Welcome to chegg.net homepage info - get ready to check Chegg best content for Austria right away, or after learning these important things about chegg.net
Visit chegg.netWe analyzed Chegg.net page load time and found that the first response time was 475 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
chegg.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.094
91/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
475 ms
478 ms
853 ms
129 ms
369 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Chegg.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Chegg.net.
Page size can be reduced by 863.6 kB (72%)
1.2 MB
331.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Chegg.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 753.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chegg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 569.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 245.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chegg.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 245.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (70%)
76
23
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chegg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chegg.net
475 ms
www.chegg.net
478 ms
www.chegg.net
853 ms
custom.css
129 ms
bootstrap.css
369 ms
responsive.css
349 ms
magnific-popup.css
359 ms
jquery.js
738 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
500 ms
styles.css
375 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
28 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.css
461 ms
font-awesome.min.css
478 ms
front.css
485 ms
dashicons.min.css
625 ms
frontend.css
576 ms
style.css
598 ms
jquery.js
721 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
623 ms
bootstrap.min.js
693 ms
jquery.cookie.js
716 ms
front.js
775 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
774 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
806 ms
maxmegamenu.js
851 ms
bootstrap.js
853 ms
gray.js
883 ms
jquery.form.min.js
884 ms
scripts.js
885 ms
core.min.js
923 ms
datepicker.min.js
958 ms
datepicker-de.min.js
20 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.min.js
964 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-de.js
982 ms
widget.min.js
998 ms
mouse.min.js
997 ms
slider.min.js
1032 ms
button.min.js
1072 ms
jquery-ui-sliderAccess.js
1082 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
347 ms
css
56 ms
analytics.js
59 ms
cheggnet-logo.png
277 ms
car.png
277 ms
bike_navi.png
301 ms
truck_navi.png
341 ms
tailer_navi.png
355 ms
tractor_navi.png
371 ms
helth.png
400 ms
endowment_navi.png
401 ms
care_navi.png
415 ms
accident_navi.png
456 ms
life_navi.png
473 ms
profession_navi.png
490 ms
home.png
523 ms
home_navi.png
524 ms
legal_insurance_navi.png
529 ms
cheggnet-logo-sm.png
570 ms
sdk.js
46 ms
headerBG.jpg
703 ms
icons_navi.png
600 ms
motor_navi_dark.png
640 ms
bike_navi_dark.png
640 ms
home_navi_dark.png
637 ms
accident_navi_dark.png
678 ms
tractor_navi_dark.png
719 ms
health_navi_dark.png
728 ms
legal_insurance_navi_dark.png
738 ms
sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
864 ms
6nvU963vW96zvuZHXyGvkNfLa8try2vLa8try2vLa8try2vLaPbzi90vRj6IfRT+KfhS9KHpR9KLoRdGLohdFL4peFL0oelH0ouhF0YuiF0Uvil4UvSh6UfSi6EXRi6IXRS+KXhS9KHpR9KHoQ9GHog9FH4o+FD0oelD0oOToN3TgiAFDRg4b9C8VmLmgAAAAAVWwJZkAAA==
12 ms
collect
21 ms
61 ms
xd_arbiter.php
56 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
727 ms
endowment_navi_dark.png
718 ms
life_navi_dark.png
730 ms
care_navi_dark.png
743 ms
profession_navi_dark.png
747 ms
truck_navi_dark.png
768 ms
tailer_navi_dark.png
764 ms
icons1.png
741 ms
scroll_top.png
735 ms
chegg.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
chegg.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
chegg.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chegg.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chegg.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chegg.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chegg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: