Tools & Wizards About Us
chehoma.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

chehoma.com

chehoma | atelier d'ambiances

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

208 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

chehoma.com screenshot

About Website

Visit chehoma.com now to see the best up-to-date Chehoma content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chehoma.com

Visit chehoma.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chehoma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chehoma.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.908

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chehoma.com

208 ms

117 ms

bulma.css

363 ms

mystyles.css

911 ms

main.css

554 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Chehoma.com, 16% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (982 ms) belongs to the original domain Chehoma.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (18%)

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chehoma.com main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 28.2 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 228.4 kB

  • Original 5.5 MB
  • After minification 5.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chehoma images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 203.8 kB

  • Original 245.9 kB
  • After minification 169.1 kB
  • After compression 42.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 757.0 kB

  • Original 854.1 kB
  • After minification 688.6 kB
  • After compression 97.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chehoma.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 757.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (45%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chehoma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chehoma.com

chehoma.com

208 ms

117 ms

bulma.css

bulma.css

363 ms

mystyles.css

mystyles.css

911 ms

main.css

main.css

554 ms

hamburgers.css

hamburgers.css

377 ms

slick.css

slick.css

284 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

285 ms

da4b5dbeb8.js

da4b5dbeb8.js

69 ms

tarteaucitron.js

tarteaucitron.js

643 ms

lozad.min.js

lozad.min.js

47 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

37 ms

jquery.easing.compatibility.min.js

jquery.easing.compatibility.min.js

59 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

66 ms

selectize.min.js

selectize.min.js

67 ms

selectize.min.css

selectize.min.css

61 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

376 ms

main.js

main.js

451 ms

slick.js

slick.js

556 ms

css

css

36 ms

css2

css2

54 ms

css2

css2

25 ms

chehoma-logo.svg

chehoma-logo.svg

101 ms

chehoma-logo-full.svg

chehoma-logo-full.svg

103 ms

_0001_chehomabanner_2.jpg

_0001_chehomabanner_2.jpg

392 ms

_0004_chehomabanner_5.jpg

_0004_chehomabanner_5.jpg

659 ms

_0005_chehomabanner_6.jpg

_0005_chehomabanner_6.jpg

661 ms

_0000_chehomabanner_1.jpg

_0000_chehomabanner_1.jpg

834 ms

_0003_chehomabanner_4.jpg

_0003_chehomabanner_4.jpg

576 ms

_0002_chehomabanner_3.jpg

_0002_chehomabanner_3.jpg

488 ms

_0006_chehomabanner_7.jpg

_0006_chehomabanner_7.jpg

679 ms

large.jpg

large.jpg

623 ms

large.jpg

large.jpg

685 ms

large.jpg

large.jpg

746 ms

large.jpg

large.jpg

754 ms

Galerie-d-inspiration-homepage2.jpg

Galerie-d-inspiration-homepage2.jpg

851 ms

64142110.png

64142110.png

785 ms

Sans-titre-2_07.jpg

Sans-titre-2_07.jpg

982 ms

m-objet.jpg

m-objet.jpg

943 ms

Luminaires_CAT370x370.png

Luminaires_CAT370x370.png

851 ms

Rsociaux_420x420.png

Rsociaux_420x420.png

883 ms

chehoma-logo-full-white.svg

chehoma-logo-full-white.svg

944 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

33 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

53 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

69 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

71 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ABc9.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ABc9.ttf

70 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjARc9.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjARc9.ttf

71 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc9.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc9.ttf

70 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvUDQ.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvUDQ.ttf

68 ms

Accessibility Review

chehoma.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chehoma.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chehoma.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chehoma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chehoma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chehoma.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chehoma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: