Tools & Wizards About Us
chesterfieldprocessservice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

chesterfieldprocessservice.com

Chesterfield Process Service, LLC | Reliable Virginia Process Servers

Page Load Speed

943 ms in total

First Response

19 ms

Resources Loaded

423 ms

Page Rendered

501 ms

chesterfieldprocessservice.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chesterfieldprocessservice.com homepage info - get ready to check Chesterfield Process Service best content right away, or after learning these important things about chesterfieldprocessservice.com

Chesterfield Process Service, LLC offers reliable and professional process service and other legal services to law firms, corporations, and individuals throughout Virginia.

Visit chesterfieldprocessservice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chesterfieldprocessservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 19 ms and then it took 924 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chesterfieldprocessservice.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chesterfieldprocessservice.com

19 ms

www.chesterfieldprocess.com

94 ms

css

48 ms

font-awesome.min.css

44 ms

application.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chesterfieldprocessservice.com, 24% (4 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 18% (3 requests) were made to Chesterfieldprocess.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (118 ms) relates to the external source S3.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

187.6 kB

After Optimization

162.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Chesterfieldprocessservice.com main page is 187.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 145.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 145.9 kB
  • After minification 135.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chesterfield Process Service images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chesterfield Process Service. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chesterfieldprocessservice.com

chesterfieldprocessservice.com

19 ms

www.chesterfieldprocess.com

www.chesterfieldprocess.com

94 ms

css

css

48 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

44 ms

application.css

application.css

32 ms

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

jquery-2.1.4.min.js

42 ms

application.js

application.js

83 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

42 ms

original.jpg

original.jpg

118 ms

original.png

original.png

93 ms

original.png

original.png

83 ms

original.png

original.png

83 ms

font

font

85 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

11 ms

font

font

7 ms

js

js

50 ms

Accessibility Review

chesterfieldprocessservice.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

chesterfieldprocessservice.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

chesterfieldprocessservice.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chesterfieldprocessservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chesterfieldprocessservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chesterfieldprocessservice.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chesterfield Process Service. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: