5.8 sec in total
271 ms
5.1 sec
398 ms
Click here to check amazing CHFG content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chfg.org
CHFG. The charity works with clinicians and experts to promote the use of Human Factors Science to make healthcare safer for patients and staff.
Visit chfg.orgWe analyzed Chfg.org page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
chfg.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value19.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
0/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
22/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
271 ms
2296 ms
433 ms
735 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Chfg.org, 28% (20 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Chfg.org.
Page size can be reduced by 189.8 kB (34%)
565.4 kB
375.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Chfg.org main page is 565.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 169.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 140.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CHFG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chfg.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (79%)
48
10
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CHFG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chfg.org
271 ms
2296 ms
front.min.css
433 ms
style.min.css
735 ms
css
28 ms
wpbdp_custom_style.css
730 ms
style.css
747 ms
front.min.js
748 ms
jquery.min.js
892 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
749 ms
lity.min.js
835 ms
widgets.js
21 ms
js
53 ms
masonry.min.js
762 ms
salvattore.js
788 ms
scripts.min.js
1109 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
772 ms
jquery.mobile.js
861 ms
easypiechart.js
872 ms
common.js
882 ms
style.css
239 ms
524808483
370 ms
970665
336 ms
21011759-54321f647e8bc8ab150b5913efd957275109ba02d79852801dfceed77917c802-d_295x166
267 ms
302274454
335 ms
logo-100.jpg
119 ms
76802276_m-copy.jpg
391 ms
preloader.gif
124 ms
Whats-the-point-of-Clinical-Human-Factors-and-ergonomics.jpg
1463 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff
45 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff
52 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff
62 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff
70 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff
70 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff
70 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff
69 ms
ET-Extra.woff
173 ms
modules.woff
300 ms
et-extra-dynamic-770-late.css
110 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
27 ms
api.js
36 ms
settings
136 ms
524808483
15 ms
970665
13 ms
302274454
11 ms
524808483
231 ms
970665
132 ms
302274454
180 ms
timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js
3 ms
ClinicalHF
140 ms
we-are-following
167 ms
api.js
13 ms
polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js
3 ms
runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js
18 ms
modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js
21 ms
main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js
36 ms
_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js
65 ms
%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js
64 ms
_buildManifest.js
81 ms
_ssgManifest.js
82 ms
%5Bslug%5D-bbaf0ad3c99bb35955c4.js
55 ms
8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js
15 ms
1755.07a49c40b12af4f75780.js
15 ms
8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js
7 ms
3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js
14 ms
1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js
12 ms
4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js
15 ms
5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js
11 ms
6426.c62f237d2be1a2371308.js
10 ms
style.min.css
120 ms
chfg.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chfg.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chfg.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chfg.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chfg.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chfg.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CHFG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: