2.3 sec in total
613 ms
1.4 sec
308 ms
Visit chic2015.org now to see the best up-to-date CHIC2015 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chic2015.org
Visit chic2015.orgWe analyzed Chic2015.org page load time and found that the first response time was 613 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
chic2015.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
613 ms
42 ms
23 ms
30 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Chic2015.org, 13% (11 requests) were made to Hosted.covchurch.org and 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (654 ms) belongs to the original domain Chic2015.org.
Page size can be reduced by 844.7 kB (32%)
2.7 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Chic2015.org main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CHIC2015 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 501.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 501.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 257.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chic2015.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 257.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (67%)
73
24
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CHIC2015. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chic2015.org
613 ms
style.css
42 ms
shortcodes.css
23 ms
font-awesome.min.css
30 ms
fontello.css
25 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
47 ms
layerslider.css
30 ms
css
48 ms
styles.css
32 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
33 ms
jquery.js
63 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
48 ms
admin.js
33 ms
shortcodes.js
46 ms
powered-by.js
47 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
48 ms
greensock.js
59 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
85 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
58 ms
comment-reply.min.js
56 ms
stickThis.js
56 ms
jquery.form.min.js
120 ms
scripts.js
120 ms
retina.js
123 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
122 ms
hoverIntent.js
121 ms
jquery.validate.pack.js
123 ms
comment-form-validation.js
127 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
130 ms
jquery.sfmenu.js
126 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
50 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
38 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
36 ms
widgets.js
111 ms
pf-button.gif
153 ms
analytics.js
109 ms
printfriendly.js
152 ms
chic2015.org
654 ms
CHIC-SHIFTlogo.v2.png
108 ms
blank.gif
108 ms
dateline2.png
109 ms
shift-devotional-button.png
146 ms
projectblue-button.png
146 ms
shift-button.png
146 ms
ecc-facebook.png
148 ms
ecc-twitter.png
147 ms
ecc-instagram.png
149 ms
soundcloud.png
147 ms
CHIC-spacer.gif
150 ms
chicdates-square.png
157 ms
skin.css
88 ms
7YeX5qGGVrvjpqFsvxNSRALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
44 ms
kcf5uOXucLcbFOydGU24WALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
44 ms
pTzFBqwzDU5_uumHzlVDTevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
45 ms
Kom15zUm24dIPfIRiNogNuvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
46 ms
2V_mouV5odI0UgtVODTOwvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
45 ms
qIIYRU-oROkIk8vfvxw6QvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
44 ms
sccV8o9st-AMv7Su44YKKQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
43 ms
qdgUG4U09HnJwhYI-uK18wLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
45 ms
Ue1lpEind3fdmHHQkRYdowLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
45 ms
G2uphNnNqGFMHLRsO_72ngLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
45 ms
modernpics-webfont.woff
44 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
50 ms
collect
33 ms
133785820
101 ms
collect
65 ms
syndication
114 ms
620960067404333056
240 ms
player.js
118 ms
player.css
97 ms
ga.js
169 ms
vuid.min.js
114 ms
SHIFT-slider.e.jpg
83 ms
SHIFT-slider.c.jpg
126 ms
SHIFT-slider.b.jpg
126 ms
SHIFT-slider.d.jpg
126 ms
skin.png
64 ms
proxy.html
28 ms
526990274.webp
104 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
1f451.png
142 ms
2728.png
124 ms
1f3a4.png
123 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
19 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
32 ms
chic2015.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
<object> elements do not have alternate text
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chic2015.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chic2015.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document uses plugins
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chic2015.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chic2015.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chic2015.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CHIC2015. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: