Tools & Wizards About Us
chicco.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

chicco.com

Official Corporate Chicco website

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

307 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

135 ms

chicco.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chicco.com homepage info - get ready to check Chicco best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about chicco.com

Our mission has always been to make a baby smile, helping mums and dads in their baby’s growth journey!

Visit chicco.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chicco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chicco.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chicco.com

307 ms

www.chicco.com

928 ms

main.js

46 ms

campaignBanner.js

72 ms

global.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Chicco.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (928 ms) belongs to the original domain Chicco.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

391.4 kB

After Optimization

352.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chicco.com main page is 391.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 249.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 36.1 kB
  • After minification 35.8 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 38.1 kB
  • After minification 36.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chicco images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 249.4 kB
  • After minification 249.4 kB
  • After compression 240.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 30 B

  • Original 67.8 kB
  • After minification 67.8 kB
  • After compression 67.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chicco.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (27%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chicco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chicco.com

chicco.com

307 ms

www.chicco.com

www.chicco.com

928 ms

main.js

main.js

46 ms

campaignBanner.js

campaignBanner.js

72 ms

global.css

global.css

45 ms

tiny-slider.css

tiny-slider.css

67 ms

storePage.css

storePage.css

70 ms

campaignBanner.css

campaignBanner.css

69 ms

uc.js

uc.js

67 ms

dwanalytics-22.2.js

dwanalytics-22.2.js

102 ms

dwac-21.7.js

dwac-21.7.js

102 ms

gretel.min.js

gretel.min.js

64 ms

tiny-slider.css

tiny-slider.css

54 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

85 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

49 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

43 ms

flag-arg.png

flag-arg.png

48 ms

flag-bra.png

flag-bra.png

42 ms

flag-mex.png

flag-mex.png

46 ms

flag-usa.png

flag-usa.png

39 ms

FlagChile.png

FlagChile.png

61 ms

flag-ind.png

flag-ind.png

59 ms

flag-isr.png

flag-isr.png

60 ms

australia.png

australia.png

58 ms

nuovazelanda.png

nuovazelanda.png

62 ms

flag-ita.png

flag-ita.png

95 ms

flag-bel.png

flag-bel.png

96 ms

flag-deu.png

flag-deu.png

97 ms

flag-esp.png

flag-esp.png

98 ms

flag-grc.png

flag-grc.png

98 ms

flag-fra.png

flag-fra.png

98 ms

flag-nld.png

flag-nld.png

96 ms

flag-rus.png

flag-rus.png

99 ms

flag-prt.png

flag-prt.png

116 ms

flag-pol.png

flag-pol.png

98 ms

flag-che.png

flag-che.png

116 ms

flag-tur.png

flag-tur.png

117 ms

flag-gbr.png

flag-gbr.png

116 ms

flag-ukr.png

flag-ukr.png

118 ms

flag-are.png

flag-are.png

122 ms

flag-egy.png

flag-egy.png

117 ms

libano.png

libano.png

120 ms

Montserrat-Regular.ttf

Montserrat-Regular.ttf

444 ms

Montserrat-SemiBold.ttf

Montserrat-SemiBold.ttf

452 ms

Montserrat-Bold.ttf

Montserrat-Bold.ttf

458 ms

js

js

60 ms

Accessibility Review

chicco.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

chicco.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

chicco.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chicco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chicco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chicco.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chicco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: