Tools & Wizards About Us
chickasaw.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

chickasaw.net

Home | Chickasaw Nation

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

722 ms

chickasaw.net screenshot

About Website

Visit chickasaw.net now to see the best up-to-date Chickasaw content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chickasaw.net

Official website for the Chickasaw Nation, located in Oklahoma.

Visit chickasaw.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Chickasaw.net page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chickasaw.net performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chickasaw.net

147 ms

chickasaw.net

413 ms

GetResource.ashx

257 ms

jquery-3.6.4.min.js

29 ms

bootstrap-min.aspx

300 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Chickasaw.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (661 ms) belongs to the original domain Chickasaw.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 931.5 kB (22%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Chickasaw.net main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 39.8 kB

  • Original 52.1 kB
  • After minification 46.2 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 717.1 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chickasaw needs image optimization as it can save up to 717.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 174.6 kB

  • Original 292.3 kB
  • After minification 242.0 kB
  • After compression 117.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174.6 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chickasaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chickasaw.net

chickasaw.net

147 ms

chickasaw.net

chickasaw.net

413 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

257 ms

jquery-3.6.4.min.js

jquery-3.6.4.min.js

29 ms

bootstrap-min.aspx

bootstrap-min.aspx

300 ms

controls.aspx

controls.aspx

135 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

45 ms

jquery-flexslider.aspx

jquery-flexslider.aspx

220 ms

lightgallery.aspx

lightgallery.aspx

222 ms

f7ec800c5b.js

f7ec800c5b.js

88 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

60 ms

css

css

46 ms

css2

css2

62 ms

css2

css2

69 ms

css2

css2

67 ms

89490719.js

89490719.js

29 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

134 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

180 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

179 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

224 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

271 ms

GetResource.ashx

GetResource.ashx

271 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

328 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

271 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

327 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

336 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

338 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

116 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

158 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

114 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

69 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

246 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

246 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

369 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

470 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

222 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

276 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

470 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

274 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

274 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

368 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

368 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

368 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

405 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

400 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

400 ms

GetFile.aspx

GetFile.aspx

403 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

661 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

502 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

399 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

424 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

426 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

484 ms

getfile.aspx

getfile.aspx

446 ms

font

font

79 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

43 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

77 ms

font

font

79 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

78 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

51 ms

js

js

45 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

9 ms

collect

collect

79 ms

collect

collect

99 ms

js

js

56 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

413 ms

Accessibility Review

chickasaw.net accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chickasaw.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

chickasaw.net SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chickasaw.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chickasaw.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chickasaw.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chickasaw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: