Tools & Wizards About Us
chickmachine.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

chickmachine.com

Chick Machine Co.

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

chickmachine.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chickmachine.com homepage info - get ready to check Chick Machine best content right away, or after learning these important things about chickmachine.com

Innovative Solutions. Superior Quality. A proud 50-year heritage of commitment to technical excellence Learn more ► Chick Machine is a single source supplier of precision products with complete in-hou...

Visit chickmachine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chickmachine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chickmachine.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chickmachine.com

181 ms

chickmachine.com

1150 ms

style.css

54 ms

fe41456098624f08cf1d725476eadaa0.min.css

441 ms

jquery.min.js

163 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Chickmachine.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Chickmachine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 99.6 kB (19%)

Content Size

521.9 kB

After Optimization

422.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chickmachine.com main page is 521.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 192.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

  • Original 77.4 kB
  • After minification 76.8 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 109 B

  • Original 147.8 kB
  • After minification 147.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chick Machine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 192.3 kB
  • After minification 192.3 kB
  • After compression 160.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 104.4 kB
  • After minification 104.3 kB
  • After compression 103.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chickmachine.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chick Machine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chickmachine.com

chickmachine.com

181 ms

chickmachine.com

chickmachine.com

1150 ms

style.css

style.css

54 ms

fe41456098624f08cf1d725476eadaa0.min.css

fe41456098624f08cf1d725476eadaa0.min.css

441 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

163 ms

js

js

88 ms

5d2af507569ff8ef23f6a756cbdb6dd1.min.js

5d2af507569ff8ef23f6a756cbdb6dd1.min.js

272 ms

chick_machine_logo.jpg

chick_machine_logo.jpg

75 ms

copper-material.jpg

copper-material.jpg

170 ms

home-alumninum-part.jpg

home-alumninum-part.jpg

76 ms

industry-energy.jpg

industry-energy.jpg

74 ms

dam_industry.jpg

dam_industry.jpg

108 ms

aerospace-industry.jpg

aerospace-industry.jpg

108 ms

medical-industry.jpg

medical-industry.jpg

109 ms

industry-pho.jpg

industry-pho.jpg

170 ms

itar-registered.jpg

itar-registered.jpg

171 ms

js

js

84 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

196 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

101 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

Accessibility Review

chickmachine.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

chickmachine.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

chickmachine.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chickmachine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chickmachine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chickmachine.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chick Machine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: