10.6 sec in total
1.2 sec
8.9 sec
489 ms
Click here to check amazing Chiefcontainer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chiefcontainer.com
Print, Display, Packaging, and Fulfillment Services. With a commitment to quality, our team takes pride in producing great results for businesses like yours.
Visit chiefcontainer.comWe analyzed Chiefcontainer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
chiefcontainer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value16.3 s
0/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
1162 ms
2296 ms
501 ms
568 ms
639 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chiefcontainer.com, 61% (36 requests) were made to Choosechief.com and 36% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Choosechief.com.
Page size can be reduced by 142.9 kB (7%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Chiefcontainer.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chiefcontainer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 573 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 43.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chiefcontainer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (56%)
34
15
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chiefcontainer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chiefcontainer.com
1162 ms
www.choosechief.com
2296 ms
style.min.css
501 ms
style.css
568 ms
style.css
639 ms
plugins.min.css
836 ms
modules.min.css
1441 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1233 ms
style.min.css
1202 ms
ionicons.min.css
1214 ms
style.css
2420 ms
style.css
1480 ms
simple-line-icons.css
1316 ms
dripicons.css
1415 ms
icomoon.css
1497 ms
style_dynamic.css
1633 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
1554 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
1572 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
1623 ms
js_composer.min.css
1748 ms
css
30 ms
flexslider.min.css
1674 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
1669 ms
lazyload.min.js
1767 ms
About-bg.jpg
1565 ms
printing.jpg
2403 ms
Case-Study.jpg
1834 ms
forest-bg.jpg
1961 ms
fullfilment.jpg
2311 ms
connetc-bg.jpg
3055 ms
in-news-bg.jpg
895 ms
footer_bg.jpg
223 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
107 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
119 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
121 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf
121 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf
120 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
120 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
119 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf
121 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf
122 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
160 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
162 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
162 ms
ionicons.ttf
345 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf
162 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf
162 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWV4exQ.ttf
162 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf
163 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf
164 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf
164 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
707 ms
chief-logo.png
191 ms
logo_chief.png
295 ms
slider_3.jpg
634 ms
logo_white.png
587 ms
chiefcontainer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chiefcontainer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
chiefcontainer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chiefcontainer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chiefcontainer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chiefcontainer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chiefcontainer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: