Tools & Wizards About Us
childrenchoice.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

childrenchoice.in

Children Choice Publication – A hallmark of virtue and learning

Page Load Speed

11.7 sec in total

First Response

2.5 sec

Resources Loaded

8.8 sec

Page Rendered

388 ms

childrenchoice.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Children Choice content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about childrenchoice.in

Visit childrenchoice.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Childrenchoice.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

childrenchoice.in performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

childrenchoice.in

2483 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

871 ms

style.min.css

1135 ms

styles.css

428 ms

main.css

645 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Childrenchoice.in, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Childrenchoice.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (60%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Childrenchoice.in main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 130.5 kB

  • Original 157.4 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 75.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 991.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Children Choice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 622.1 kB

  • Original 867.2 kB
  • After minification 810.5 kB
  • After compression 245.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 622.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 204.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Childrenchoice.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (72%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Children Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

childrenchoice.in

childrenchoice.in

2483 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

871 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1135 ms

styles.css

styles.css

428 ms

main.css

main.css

645 ms

theme-icons.css

theme-icons.css

643 ms

style.css

style.css

1549 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

1165 ms

css

css

36 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

899 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

858 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1283 ms

testimonial-rotator-style.css

testimonial-rotator-style.css

954 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1506 ms

style.css

style.css

1115 ms

groundwork-responsive.css

groundwork-responsive.css

1849 ms

style.css

style.css

1766 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

1397 ms

ed_school_options_style.css

ed_school_options_style.css

1496 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1878 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1711 ms

jquery.cycletwo.js

jquery.cycletwo.js

1720 ms

jquery.cycletwo.addons.js

jquery.cycletwo.addons.js

1774 ms

modernizr-2.7.0.min.js

modernizr-2.7.0.min.js

1923 ms

css

css

21 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

1803 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1883 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1883 ms

css

css

19 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

2003 ms

332.app.js

332.app.js

2028 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

2027 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

2029 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

2461 ms

jquery-parallax.js

jquery-parallax.js

2035 ms

fitvids.js

fitvids.js

2226 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

2218 ms

hoverintent.js

hoverintent.js

2236 ms

scrollup.js

scrollup.js

2218 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

2246 ms

natural-width-height.js

natural-width-height.js

2230 ms

fakeLoader.min.js

fakeLoader.min.js

2179 ms

wheels-main.min.js

wheels-main.min.js

2019 ms

underscore-before.js

underscore-before.js

2046 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1951 ms

underscore-after.js

underscore-after.js

2002 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1972 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

1931 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

1771 ms

public.js

public.js

1738 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1635 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1678 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

1590 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

138 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

1160 ms

Children-Choice-Logo.png

Children-Choice-Logo.png

1158 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

1159 ms

55.jpg

55.jpg

1657 ms

00.png

00.png

1323 ms

01.png

01.png

1333 ms

spendid.jpg

spendid.jpg

1360 ms

7-1.jpg

7-1.jpg

1367 ms

5-4.jpg

5-4.jpg

1339 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

122 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

225 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

225 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff

230 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

231 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

231 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

229 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

229 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

227 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

231 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

79 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

118 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1505 ms

6-4.jpg

6-4.jpg

1636 ms

3-4.jpg

3-4.jpg

1453 ms

ed-icon.ttf

ed-icon.ttf

1324 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1357 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1502 ms

2-2.jpg

2-2.jpg

1524 ms

4-3.jpg

4-3.jpg

1474 ms

04-1.jpg

04-1.jpg

1381 ms

ample.jpg

ample.jpg

1425 ms

playpen-1.jpg

playpen-1.jpg

1507 ms

empirical.jpg

empirical.jpg

1514 ms

mainqr-150x150.jpg

mainqr-150x150.jpg

1522 ms

new-pixel.png

new-pixel.png

2481 ms

Accessibility Review

childrenchoice.in accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

childrenchoice.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

childrenchoice.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Childrenchoice.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Childrenchoice.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

childrenchoice.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Children Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: