5.2 sec in total
346 ms
4.7 sec
168 ms
Visit chimec.com now to see the best up-to-date Chimec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chimec.com
Here you can find all the information about Technologies and Services for Oilfield, Process and Water Treatments, Fuel Additives and Decontamination.
Visit chimec.comWe analyzed Chimec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
chimec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
346 ms
864 ms
33 ms
195 ms
286 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Chimec.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (926 ms) belongs to the original domain Chimec.com.
Page size can be reduced by 351.4 kB (25%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Chimec.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 928.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 263.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 263.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chimec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chimec.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (88%)
60
7
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chimec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chimec.com
346 ms
www.chimec.com
864 ms
css
33 ms
formidableforms.css
195 ms
style.min.css
286 ms
mappress.css
289 ms
theme-my-login.min.css
286 ms
wordpress-gdpr-public.css
290 ms
font-awesome.min.css
34 ms
style.min.css
289 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
291 ms
cms-navigation.css
380 ms
style.css
380 ms
stylesheet.min.css
488 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
383 ms
style_dynamic.css
385 ms
responsive.min.css
388 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
474 ms
custom_css.css
473 ms
style.css
478 ms
front.bundle.css
481 ms
imageFilter.bundle.css
483 ms
style.min.css
571 ms
entypo.bundle.css
770 ms
backgroundSimple.bundle.css
477 ms
jquery.min.js
579 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
484 ms
app.js
494 ms
front.js
570 ms
css
18 ms
tw-bs4.css
589 ms
font-awesome.min.css
587 ms
front.css
657 ms
rs6.css
670 ms
runtime.bundle.js
673 ms
front.bundle.js
681 ms
fullWidth.bundle.js
683 ms
lazyLoad.bundle.js
752 ms
menuToggle.bundle.js
855 ms
sandwichMenu.min.js
855 ms
rbtools.min.js
858 ms
rs6.min.js
818 ms
theme-my-login.min.js
683 ms
wordpress-gdpr-public.js
711 ms
custom-scripts.js
708 ms
qode-like.js
708 ms
plugins.js
926 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
856 ms
lemmon-slider.js
766 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
767 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
762 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
763 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
788 ms
default_dynamic.js
703 ms
default.min.js
740 ms
custom_js.js
699 ms
comment-reply.min.js
732 ms
logo-chimec-161x110.png
420 ms
en.png
420 ms
it.png
421 ms
fr.png
421 ms
dummy.png
422 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
43 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
76 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
177 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
176 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
177 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
178 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf
178 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
40 ms
entypo.ttf
359 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
95 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
194 ms
logo.png
620 ms
chimec.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
chimec.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chimec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chimec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chimec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chimec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: