Tools & Wizards About Us
chineestyle.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

chineestyle.com

Chineestyle Co.,Ltd

Page Load Speed

11.2 sec in total

First Response

679 ms

Resources Loaded

9.8 sec

Page Rendered

704 ms

chineestyle.com screenshot

About Website

Visit chineestyle.com now to see the best up-to-date Chineestyle content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chineestyle.com

Chineestyle Co.,Ltd

Visit chineestyle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chineestyle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 679 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chineestyle.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chineestyle.com

679 ms

chineestyle.com

2871 ms

bootstrap.min.css

750 ms

ion.rangeSlider.min.css

746 ms

font-awesome.min.css

755 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Chineestyle.com, 60% (58 requests) were made to Static.ltdcdn.com and 31% (30 requests) were made to Uploadfile.ltdcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) relates to the external source Uploadfile.ltdcdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (20%)

Content Size

11.3 MB

After Optimization

9.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chineestyle.com main page is 11.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 273.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 684.0 kB

  • Original 9.2 MB
  • After minification 8.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chineestyle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 52.5 kB

  • Original 285.9 kB
  • After minification 285.8 kB
  • After compression 233.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chineestyle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (56%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

41

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chineestyle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chineestyle.com

chineestyle.com

679 ms

chineestyle.com

chineestyle.com

2871 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

750 ms

ion.rangeSlider.min.css

ion.rangeSlider.min.css

746 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

755 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

757 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

760 ms

pagination.css

pagination.css

760 ms

slider-pro.min.css

slider-pro.min.css

776 ms

marquee.css

marquee.css

779 ms

layer.min.css

layer.min.css

779 ms

style.css

style.css

849 ms

font_925836_jkocxsylryr.css

font_925836_jkocxsylryr.css

46 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.css

bootstrap-datepicker.css

780 ms

froala_editor.pkgd.min.css

froala_editor.pkgd.min.css

782 ms

frcss.css

frcss.css

805 ms

default-skin.min.css

default-skin.min.css

809 ms

photoswipe.min.css

photoswipe.min.css

809 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

838 ms

ion.rangeSlider.js

ion.rangeSlider.js

812 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

840 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

837 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

839 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

902 ms

swiper.animate1.0.3.min.js

swiper.animate1.0.3.min.js

907 ms

jquery.sliderPro.min.js

jquery.sliderPro.min.js

908 ms

layer.js

layer.js

908 ms

laydate.js

laydate.js

907 ms

marquee.js

marquee.js

913 ms

api

api

1367 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.js

bootstrap-datepicker.js

913 ms

jquery.pagination.js

jquery.pagination.js

913 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

914 ms

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

913 ms

jweixin-1.4.0.js

jweixin-1.4.0.js

17 ms

plupload.full.js

plupload.full.js

913 ms

hls.min.js

hls.min.js

919 ms

DPlayer.min.js

DPlayer.min.js

936 ms

countUp.min.js

countUp.min.js

929 ms

iconpark.js

iconpark.js

1031 ms

iconfont.js

iconfont.js

956 ms

element.2.15.14.css

element.2.15.14.css

222 ms

nprogress.css

nprogress.css

205 ms

euv.js

euv.js

258 ms

element.2.15.14.js

element.2.15.14.js

281 ms

analyst.js

analyst.js

230 ms

page.min.js

page.min.js

243 ms

nprogress.js

nprogress.js

223 ms

jquery.pjax.js

jquery.pjax.js

244 ms

esitrevda.js

esitrevda.js

251 ms

iframeResizer.js

iframeResizer.js

257 ms

layer.css

layer.css

132 ms

laydate.css

laydate.css

32 ms

getscript

getscript

1415 ms

bmap.css

bmap.css

642 ms

16232309132164.png

16232309132164.png

1972 ms

17091781909879.jpg

17091781909879.jpg

311 ms

17091781909107.jpg

17091781909107.jpg

375 ms

17062491917471.jpg

17062491917471.jpg

1189 ms

17090206845467.png

17090206845467.png

1652 ms

17090204451005.png

17090204451005.png

1188 ms

qrcode.jpg

qrcode.jpg

57 ms

wshare.png

wshare.png

79 ms

16607201032723.jpg

16607201032723.jpg

2216 ms

16607209364728.jpg

16607209364728.jpg

2409 ms

16607209742838.jpg

16607209742838.jpg

2391 ms

16662502576634.png

16662502576634.png

2477 ms

16662502586773.png

16662502586773.png

2330 ms

16662502583140.png

16662502583140.png

2399 ms

16662502582132.png

16662502582132.png

2672 ms

16662502587803.png

16662502587803.png

2686 ms

17089273498361.jpg

17089273498361.jpg

2555 ms

17089273493887.jpg

17089273493887.jpg

2550 ms

17089273499000.jpg

17089273499000.jpg

2559 ms

17089273491236.jpg

17089273491236.jpg

2642 ms

17089273497592.jpg

17089273497592.jpg

2724 ms

17089273491268.jpg

17089273491268.jpg

2714 ms

17089273482592.jpg

17089273482592.jpg

2711 ms

17091781908204.jpg

17091781908204.jpg

2806 ms

17091781902557.jpg

17091781902557.jpg

2860 ms

17091781896650.jpg

17091781896650.jpg

2833 ms

17062603962195.jpg

17062603962195.jpg

2874 ms

16228745072064.jpg

16228745072064.jpg

2859 ms

17090204689046.png

17090204689046.png

3167 ms

17090206866066.png

17090206866066.png

2996 ms

analyst

analyst

1832 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

118 ms

17168794188222.jpg

17168794188222.jpg

3080 ms

16612393712796.jpg

16612393712796.jpg

3003 ms

16612385777042.jpg

16612385777042.jpg

3023 ms

16612402961472.jpg

16612402961472.jpg

2996 ms

16301407623247.png

16301407623247.png

3231 ms

14910360972476.png

14910360972476.png

2934 ms

17062491554301.jpg

17062491554301.jpg

882 ms

16228775179440.jpg

16228775179440.jpg

2923 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

718 ms

push.js

push.js

1860 ms

Accessibility Review

chineestyle.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

chineestyle.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

chineestyle.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chineestyle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chineestyle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chineestyle.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chineestyle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: