11.6 sec in total
4.6 sec
6.5 sec
578 ms
Click here to check amazing Chinneck content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chinneck.ca
At Chinneck Law's London Ontario Law Office, you’re treated like family. We're ranked as one of the top 10 Law Firms in Ontario.
Visit chinneck.caWe analyzed Chinneck.ca page load time and found that the first response time was 4.6 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
chinneck.ca performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
4572 ms
397 ms
97 ms
11 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chinneck.ca, 80% (89 requests) were made to Mckenzielake.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Chinneck.ca.
Page size can be reduced by 97.1 kB (19%)
508.9 kB
411.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Chinneck.ca main page is 508.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 241.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chinneck needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chinneck.ca has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (87%)
79
10
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chinneck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chinneck.ca
4572 ms
397 ms
gtm.js
97 ms
style.min.css
11 ms
style.css
79 ms
all.min.css
49 ms
slick.min.css
403 ms
slick-theme.min.css
372 ms
blocks.style.css
53 ms
search-filter.min.css
50 ms
style.css
391 ms
style.css
394 ms
slick.css
397 ms
font-awesome.css
79 ms
jquery-ui.css
63 ms
addtoany.min.css
81 ms
shiftnav.min.css
153 ms
ubermenu.min.css
155 ms
minimal.css
228 ms
all.min.css
230 ms
font-awesome.min.css
305 ms
standard-dark.css
376 ms
jquery.min.js
509 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
463 ms
page.js
71 ms
addtoany.min.js
464 ms
search-filter-build.min.js
531 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
470 ms
core.min.js
468 ms
mckenzie.js
539 ms
slick.js
542 ms
fsquared.js
539 ms
menu.min.js
471 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
550 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
579 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
669 ms
dom-ready.min.js
607 ms
hooks.min.js
607 ms
i18n.min.js
611 ms
a11y.min.js
613 ms
js
78 ms
js
116 ms
person.css
578 ms
autocomplete.min.js
644 ms
f2-autocomplete.js
643 ms
frontend.blocks.js
669 ms
datepicker.min.js
663 ms
accordion.min.js
643 ms
effect.min.js
745 ms
mouse.min.js
745 ms
js
59 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
resizable.min.js
670 ms
draggable.min.js
666 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
46 ms
controlgroup.min.js
597 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
598 ms
ga-audiences
44 ms
button.min.js
572 ms
dialog.min.js
509 ms
ubermenu.min.js
496 ms
shiftnav.min.js
493 ms
person.js
478 ms
eso.Ep5bSEmr.js
18 ms
insight.min.js
181 ms
js
134 ms
uwt.js
134 ms
McKenzieLake_Logo_Retina-01.png
188 ms
share-blue.png
195 ms
Jed_Chinneck_FULL-1.jpg
280 ms
twobluebar.png
201 ms
Icons.png
200 ms
Footer_Crown.png
202 ms
fbevents.js
140 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Roman.woff
197 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Md.woff
274 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Lt.woff
276 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Bd.woff
277 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Hv.woff
278 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
199 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
277 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
343 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
511 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
381 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
388 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
392 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
328 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-It.woff
355 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-MdIt.woff
398 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-LtIt.woff
399 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-BdIt.woff
400 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-HvIt.woff
425 ms
sm.25.html
26 ms
insight.old.min.js
8 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
15 ms
in.php
134 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Roman.ttf
296 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Md.ttf
291 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Lt.ttf
289 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Bd.ttf
290 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Hv.ttf
308 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
265 ms
adsct
160 ms
adsct
187 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-It.ttf
306 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-MdIt.ttf
253 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-LtIt.ttf
253 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-BdIt.ttf
127 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-HvIt.ttf
247 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
71 ms
chinneck.ca accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
chinneck.ca best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
chinneck.ca SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chinneck.ca can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chinneck.ca main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chinneck.ca
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chinneck. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: