11.4 sec in total
2.3 sec
7.4 sec
1.8 sec
Visit chip-programmer.com now to see the best up-to-date Chip Programmer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chip-programmer.com
OROD technology provides global customers with universal IC chip programmer with low price and best quality.
Visit chip-programmer.comWe analyzed Chip-programmer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
chip-programmer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value1,950 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
2275 ms
226 ms
30 ms
449 ms
637 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Chip-programmer.com, 26% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Chip-programmer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 146.0 kB (11%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Chip-programmer.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 898.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chip Programmer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 378 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 233 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chip-programmer.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (73%)
52
14
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chip Programmer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.chip-programmer.com
2275 ms
frontend.min.css
226 ms
css
30 ms
style.min.css
449 ms
astra-addon-61cd4edb449353-55532534.css
637 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
650 ms
frontend.min.css
870 ms
post-9.css
656 ms
frontend.min.css
886 ms
all.min.css
673 ms
v4-shims.min.css
849 ms
global.css
866 ms
post-10.css
876 ms
css
31 ms
fontawesome.min.css
901 ms
solid.min.css
1060 ms
regular.min.css
1082 ms
jquery.min.js
1091 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1106 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1109 ms
js
62 ms
animations.min.css
1257 ms
frontend.min.js
1317 ms
astra-addon-61cd4edb46a7d5-48099996.js
1317 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1317 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1318 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1354 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1355 ms
frontend.min.js
1482 ms
waypoints.min.js
1513 ms
core.min.js
1520 ms
swiper.min.js
1755 ms
share-link.min.js
1577 ms
dialog.min.js
1575 ms
frontend.min.js
1694 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1948 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1738 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1795 ms
underscore.min.js
1800 ms
wp-util.min.js
1906 ms
frontend.min.js
1739 ms
cropped-A0.png
835 ms
ban1.jpg
860 ms
CTA-Shapes.png
2546 ms
CTA-News.png
2549 ms
ecu-programmer-2-1-300x300.jpg
1189 ms
sf600-243x300.jpg
1024 ms
sofi-sp8-1-300x284.jpg
1034 ms
auto-1-300x232.jpg
1052 ms
isp2081-1-300x291.jpg
1242 ms
ISP2001-1-300x251.jpg
1250 ms
GP400-1-300x195.jpg
1270 ms
ava4.png
2245 ms
y9.png
2109 ms
ava2.png
2333 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
51 ms
astra.woff
1327 ms
55xvey5tM9rwKWrJZfMCgL1W87DI.ttf
73 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7znU6AFw.ttf
88 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
87 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
86 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
84 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
84 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
83 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf
86 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uKLdshZg.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
86 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
87 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
89 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
116 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
117 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
117 ms
nuF2D__FSo_3I-NSjLKx60w.ttf
137 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1763 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1984 ms
chip-programmer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
chip-programmer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
chip-programmer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chip-programmer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chip-programmer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chip-programmer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chip Programmer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: