11.5 sec in total
4.4 sec
6.5 sec
640 ms
Click here to check amazing ChipKIT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chipkit.org
Visit chipkit.orgWe analyzed Chipkit.org page load time and found that the first response time was 4.4 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
chipkit.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
4359 ms
128 ms
399 ms
154 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Chipkit.org, 3% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) relates to the external source Chipkit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (38%)
3.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Chipkit.org main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 311.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ChipKIT needs image optimization as it can save up to 311.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 388.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 388.1 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 375.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chipkit.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 375.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (74%)
90
23
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ChipKIT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chipkit.net
4359 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
128 ms
gdsr.css.php
399 ms
rating.css
154 ms
style.css
158 ms
styles.css
155 ms
font-awesome.min.css
164 ms
catalogue-styles.css
228 ms
wp-socializer-buttons-css.css
223 ms
style.css
285 ms
skin.css
254 ms
custom-styles.css
258 ms
scp.css
314 ms
jquery.js
391 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
323 ms
gdsr.js
334 ms
front.js
370 ms
wpc-front.js
383 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
424 ms
suffusion.js
422 ms
shCore.js
447 ms
shBrushAS3.js
444 ms
shBrushBash.js
446 ms
shBrushColdFusion.js
445 ms
shBrushClojure.js
445 ms
shBrushCpp.js
448 ms
shBrushCSharp.js
544 ms
shBrushCss.js
563 ms
shBrushDelphi.js
575 ms
shBrushDiff.js
806 ms
shBrushErlang.js
604 ms
shBrushFSharp.js
604 ms
shBrushGroovy.js
777 ms
shBrushJava.js
816 ms
shBrushJavaFX.js
820 ms
shBrushJScript.js
881 ms
shBrushLatex.js
822 ms
shBrushMatlabKey.js
893 ms
shBrushObjC.js
882 ms
shBrushPerl.js
855 ms
shBrushPhp.js
847 ms
shBrushPlain.js
879 ms
shBrushPowerShell.js
819 ms
shBrushPython.js
889 ms
shBrushR.js
894 ms
shBrushRuby.js
885 ms
shBrushScala.js
862 ms
shBrushSql.js
842 ms
shBrushVb.js
834 ms
shBrushXml.js
850 ms
jquery.form.min.js
887 ms
scripts.js
916 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
883 ms
wp-socializer-bookmark-js.js
838 ms
widgets.js
112 ms
all.js
189 ms
plusone.js
140 ms
in.js
185 ms
widgets.js
134 ms
T7_Title.jpg
334 ms
testtest-702x336.png
161 ms
Hot_100_Logo_2015.jpg
61 ms
2tm2VKjkNKc
156 ms
FX1BHHEIC37C660.MEDIUM.jpg
132 ms
wp-embed.min.js
816 ms
ga.js
24 ms
chipKIT-Logo-HEADER2.jpg
868 ms
search-button-gray-1.png
849 ms
iconset-5.png
941 ms
microSD.png
1300 ms
DSDVOL_example.png
881 ms
DSDVOL_code_snippet.png
969 ms
stars16.png
912 ms
Hot_100_Logo_2015.jpg
76 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
6 ms
thumbs20.png
825 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
47 ms
www-embed-player.js
70 ms
base.js
105 ms
chipKIT_Range_Sensor.png
1180 ms
DP32_interrupts_photo.png
1467 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
72 ms
207 ms
Debugging_screenshot_1-1024x806.jpg
1212 ms
xd_arbiter.php
131 ms
xd_arbiter.php
202 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
48 ms
ad_status.js
76 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
68 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
67 ms
shCore.css
361 ms
shThemeDefault.css
337 ms
arrows.gif
70 ms
chipkit.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
chipkit.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chipkit.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chipkit.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chipkit.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chipkit.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ChipKIT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: