Tools & Wizards About Us
chipprotection.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

chipprotection.com

Automotive Clear Bra - CHIPPROTECTION.COM 3M auto paint protection film installation in Toronto and GTA

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

chipprotection.com screenshot

About Website

Visit chipprotection.com now to see the best up-to-date CHIPPROTECTION content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chipprotection.com

We are a 3M certified automotive clear bra installation company located in Toronto. We specialize in paint protection film application for most luxury vehicle models with great warranty, flawless qual...

Visit chipprotection.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chipprotection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chipprotection.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.099

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.chipprotection.com

271 ms

font-awesome.min.css

108 ms

animate.min.css

167 ms

sppagebuilder.css

162 ms

sppagecontainer.css

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Chipprotection.com, 18% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (639 ms) belongs to the original domain Chipprotection.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chipprotection.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 77.2 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 93.2 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CHIPPROTECTION images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 275.6 kB
  • After minification 275.6 kB
  • After compression 273.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 85.0 kB
  • After minification 84.9 kB
  • After compression 82.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chipprotection.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (60%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CHIPPROTECTION. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.chipprotection.com

www.chipprotection.com

271 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

108 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

167 ms

sppagebuilder.css

sppagebuilder.css

162 ms

sppagecontainer.css

sppagecontainer.css

159 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

159 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

43 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

268 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

168 ms

legacy.css

legacy.css

211 ms

template.css

template.css

216 ms

preset3.css

preset3.css

214 ms

pagebuilder.css

pagebuilder.css

216 ms

frontend-edit.css

frontend-edit.css

214 ms

style.css

style.css

262 ms

core.js

core.js

265 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

277 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

263 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

277 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

313 ms

sppagebuilder.js

sppagebuilder.js

317 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

316 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

369 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

322 ms

main.js

main.js

323 ms

frontend-edit.js

frontend-edit.js

364 ms

js

js

93 ms

btbase64.min.js

btbase64.min.js

372 ms

default.js

default.js

373 ms

n2-ss-2.css

n2-ss-2.css

373 ms

n2-ss-3.css

n2-ss-3.css

375 ms

n2.js

n2.js

421 ms

nextend-gsap.min.js

nextend-gsap.min.js

579 ms

nextend-frontend.min.js

nextend-frontend.min.js

473 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

435 ms

smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js

smartslider-simple-type-frontend.min.js

432 ms

nextend-webfontloader.min.js

nextend-webfontloader.min.js

433 ms

n2-ss-2.js

n2-ss-2.js

475 ms

n2-ss-3.js

n2-ss-3.js

472 ms

css

css

13 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

391 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

79 ms

slide11.jpg

slide11.jpg

290 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

287 ms

thumb31.jpg

thumb31.jpg

398 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

290 ms

skide4.jpg

skide4.jpg

501 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

548 ms

curved.png

curved.png

356 ms

video1_button.jpg

video1_button.jpg

355 ms

pack1.jpg

pack1.jpg

639 ms

pack2.jpg

pack2.jpg

445 ms

pack3.jpg

pack3.jpg

394 ms

clear_bra.jpg

clear_bra.jpg

447 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

449 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

498 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

498 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

502 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

580 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

581 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

582 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

582 ms

logo2.jpg

logo2.jpg

618 ms

font

font

209 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

232 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

232 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

232 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff

233 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

574 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

582 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

231 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

229 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwQ.woff

232 ms

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0g.woff

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0g.woff

233 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

233 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaw.woff

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaw.woff

233 ms

m8JTjflSeaOVl1iGWa3Q.woff

m8JTjflSeaOVl1iGWa3Q.woff

233 ms

m8JQjflSeaOVl1iOqo7Dd5RG.woff

m8JQjflSeaOVl1iOqo7Dd5RG.woff

234 ms

m8JQjflSeaOVl1iO4ojDd5RG.woff

m8JQjflSeaOVl1iO4ojDd5RG.woff

234 ms

Accessibility Review

chipprotection.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

chipprotection.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

chipprotection.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chipprotection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chipprotection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chipprotection.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CHIPPROTECTION. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: