Tools & Wizards About Us
chips.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

chips.com

Intel | Data Center Solutions, IoT, and PC Innovation

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

chips.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to chips.com homepage info - get ready to check Chips best content right away, or after learning these important things about chips.com

Intel's innovation in cloud computing, data center, Internet of Things, and PC solutions is powering the smart and connected digital world we live in.

Visit chips.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chips.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chips.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,510 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chips.com

235 ms

index.htm

111 ms

homepage.html

18 ms

commons-page.min.css

8 ms

commons-page.min.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Chips.com, 61% (35 requests) were made to Intel.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (48%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chips.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 514.3 kB

  • Original 536.5 kB
  • After minification 175.5 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 361.0 kB, which is 67% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 514.3 kB or 96% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 82.6 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chips images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 446.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 531.6 kB

  • Original 621.3 kB
  • After minification 614.4 kB
  • After compression 89.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chips.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 531.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (36%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chips. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chips.com

chips.com

235 ms

index.htm

index.htm

111 ms

homepage.html

homepage.html

18 ms

commons-page.min.css

commons-page.min.css

8 ms

commons-page.min.js

commons-page.min.js

67 ms

intel.rwd.override.css

intel.rwd.override.css

64 ms

tms.sync.js

tms.sync.js

64 ms

token.json

token.json

215 ms

e.gif

e.gif

79 ms

utag.js

utag.js

7 ms

mbox.js

mbox.js

54 ms

collect

collect

41 ms

collect

collect

68 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

collect

collect

68 ms

target.js

target.js

62 ms

standard

standard

16 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

427 ms

idamFormStaticSimplify.html

idamFormStaticSimplify.html

316 ms

globalnav3.out.html

globalnav3.out.html

157 ms

utag.1381.js

utag.1381.js

123 ms

icorescript.asp

icorescript.asp

236 ms

intel-logo-footer-dark-gray_64.png

intel-logo-footer-dark-gray_64.png

79 ms

intel-logo-footer-dark-gray_30.png

intel-logo-footer-dark-gray_30.png

79 ms

hdr-spr.png

hdr-spr.png

79 ms

sprite-with-gray-icons.png

sprite-with-gray-icons.png

88 ms

list-style-bullet.png

list-style-bullet.png

80 ms

ui-bar.png

ui-bar.png

87 ms

intel.web.336.252.png

intel.web.336.252.png

86 ms

intel.web.336.252.png

intel.web.336.252.png

93 ms

intel.web.336.252.png

intel.web.336.252.png

92 ms

intel.web.336.252.png

intel.web.336.252.png

89 ms

intel.web.336.252.png

intel.web.336.252.png

89 ms

anthem-butterfly-dress-homepage-takeover.jpg.rendition.intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

anthem-butterfly-dress-homepage-takeover.jpg.rendition.intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

92 ms

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

146 ms

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

139 ms

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

141 ms

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

195 ms

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

143 ms

hdr-spr.png

hdr-spr.png

138 ms

sliding-gallery-arrows.png

sliding-gallery-arrows.png

139 ms

intel.web.1648.927.jpg

intel.web.1648.927.jpg

141 ms

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

intel.web.1920.1080.jpg

142 ms

21921

21921

61 ms

intel-clear-latin-lite.woff

intel-clear-latin-lite.woff

55 ms

intel-clear-latin.woff

intel-clear-latin.woff

55 ms

intel-clear-latin-bold.woff

intel-clear-latin-bold.woff

55 ms

intel-clear-headline.woff

intel-clear-headline.woff

55 ms

elqCfg.min.js

elqCfg.min.js

35 ms

50 ms

pixel

pixel

42 ms

svrGP

svrGP

107 ms

20 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

collect

collect

5 ms

2981

2981

35 ms

svrGP.aspx

svrGP.aspx

62 ms

Accessibility Review

chips.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

chips.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

chips.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chips.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chips.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chips.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chips. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: