1.6 sec in total
43 ms
846 ms
688 ms
Visit chipthompson.com now to see the best up-to-date Chip Thompson content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chipthompson.com
Clients hire me to help them grow their businesses through web design, print design, branding, marketing and advertising.
Visit chipthompson.comWe analyzed Chipthompson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
chipthompson.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value4.0 s
87/100
10%
43 ms
64 ms
26 ms
44 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Chipthompson.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Threebestrated.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (624 ms) relates to the external source Threebestrated.com.
Page size can be reduced by 144.0 kB (16%)
911.6 kB
767.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Chipthompson.com main page is 911.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 565.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chip Thompson images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chipthompson.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (41%)
86
51
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chip Thompson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chipthompson.com
43 ms
chipthompson.com
64 ms
jquery-ui-1.7.2.custom.css
26 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
44 ms
all.css
53 ms
style.min.css
46 ms
public-main.css
36 ms
normalize.css
46 ms
style.css
50 ms
style.min.css
45 ms
addtoany.min.css
71 ms
jquery.min.js
73 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
87 ms
page.js
42 ms
addtoany.min.js
134 ms
wpgmza_data.js
91 ms
public-main.js
121 ms
email-decode.min.js
69 ms
app.min.js
119 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
126 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
126 ms
parallax.min.js
132 ms
css3-animate-it.js
135 ms
classie.js
136 ms
mlpushmenu.js
138 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
138 ms
jquery.cookie.js
144 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
153 ms
jquery.beforeafter.min.js
158 ms
init.js
158 ms
web_designers-omaha-2021-clr.svg
592 ms
AF1QipP5fRxVsxaVDJnVcg2X_geusGDd-hWL_uFFzIeR=s1600-w300-h300
346 ms
web_designers-omaha-2022-clr.svg
624 ms
logo-welcome.png
151 ms
tagline-1.png
45 ms
Best-of-B2B-2021-Winner.png
54 ms
down-arrow.png
183 ms
ico-menu.png
184 ms
logo.png
181 ms
intro-text-bg.png
183 ms
wave.png
184 ms
quote-start.png
182 ms
prev.png
191 ms
next.png
194 ms
about-bg-repeat.jpg
197 ms
about-bg-1.jpg
196 ms
chip-1.png
195 ms
ico-design.gif
193 ms
ico-web.gif
213 ms
ico-other.gif
227 ms
powered_by_google_on_non_white.png
270 ms
guest.png
217 ms
client-NCS.webp
226 ms
client-DurhamMuseum.webp
219 ms
sm.25.html
43 ms
eso.BRQnzO8v.js
178 ms
client-CH.webp
230 ms
client-RMHC.webp
228 ms
client-FontenelleForest.webp
231 ms
client-Bland.webp
231 ms
client-Clarkson.webp
230 ms
client-Stuhr.webp
241 ms
client-Goodwill.webp
240 ms
client-LFS.webp
240 ms
client-Archdiocese.webp
251 ms
client-KB.webp
246 ms
client-OPTI.webp
252 ms
client-Kobe.webp
256 ms
client-LiquidTrucking.webp
232 ms
client-Lund.webp
252 ms
KFI-logo-1.2_White_medium-e1678196515390.png
247 ms
client-MV.webp
248 ms
client-NWCOH.webp
154 ms
montserrat-light-webfont.woff
192 ms
montserrat-semibold-webfont.woff
128 ms
montserrat-bold-webfont.woff
147 ms
proxima_nova-light-webfont.woff
147 ms
proxima-nova-thin-webfont.woff
301 ms
proxima-nova-regular-webfont.woff
301 ms
proxima_nova-semibold-webfont.woff
189 ms
proxima-nova-bold-webfont.woff
206 ms
proxima_nova-extrabold-webfont.woff
309 ms
client-RobertHancock.webp
185 ms
client-NEDiaperBank.webp
200 ms
client-army.webp
200 ms
client-alzheimers.webp
227 ms
client-YMCA.webp
219 ms
client-midwestdermatology.webp
204 ms
client-FFA.webp
209 ms
client-AAU.webp
216 ms
client-Lauritzengardens.webp
217 ms
footer-bg.jpg
286 ms
glow.png
258 ms
dot.png
225 ms
welcome-bg-1.jpg
254 ms
intro-bg-1.jpg
273 ms
print.css
24 ms
chipthompson.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chipthompson.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
chipthompson.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chipthompson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chipthompson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chipthompson.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chip Thompson. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: