Tools & Wizards About Us
choice-towing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

choice-towing.com

Industry Leading Towing Services | Southaven, MS - Choice Towing

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

636 ms

choice-towing.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Choice Towing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about choice-towing.com

Look no further for industry leading towing services in Southaven, MS because Choice Towing has you covered. Call today for more info on our services.

Visit choice-towing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choice-towing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choice-towing.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,220 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.626

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choice-towing.com

42 ms

choice-towing.com

59 ms

layerslider.css

25 ms

style.css

87 ms

style.min.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Choice-towing.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to V18.6b6.myftpupload.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (492 ms) relates to the external source V18.6b6.myftpupload.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 235.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Choice-towing.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 124.5 kB

  • Original 150.1 kB
  • After minification 141.0 kB
  • After compression 25.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 369 B

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choice Towing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 89.3 kB

  • Original 515.8 kB
  • After minification 515.8 kB
  • After compression 426.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.3 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 21.5 kB

  • Original 85.9 kB
  • After minification 71.1 kB
  • After compression 64.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choice-towing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (63%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Towing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choice-towing.com

choice-towing.com

42 ms

choice-towing.com

choice-towing.com

59 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

25 ms

style.css

style.css

87 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

107 ms

styles.css

styles.css

61 ms

settings.css

settings.css

62 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

58 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

52 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

79 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

81 ms

style.css

style.css

99 ms

css

css

102 ms

wp-featherlight.min.css

wp-featherlight.min.css

109 ms

modern.css

modern.css

121 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

139 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

121 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

138 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

186 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

137 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

214 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

184 ms

modernizr.custom.20160801.js

modernizr.custom.20160801.js

210 ms

js

js

211 ms

css

css

136 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

204 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

204 ms

store-locator.css

store-locator.css

205 ms

index.js

index.js

208 ms

index.js

index.js

206 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

336 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

337 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

337 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

335 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

338 ms

wai-aria.js

wai-aria.js

337 ms

wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js

wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js

339 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

340 ms

js

js

203 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

340 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

159 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

162 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

181 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

182 ms

background2.jpg

background2.jpg

492 ms

Choice-logo249x110px.png

Choice-logo249x110px.png

150 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

153 ms

background2.jpg

background2.jpg

153 ms

imac-large-1.png

imac-large-1.png

152 ms

light-duty300x175-1.jpg

light-duty300x175-1.jpg

150 ms

mediumDuty300x175.jpg

mediumDuty300x175.jpg

150 ms

Choice-logoWHITE270px.png

Choice-logoWHITE270px.png

150 ms

js

js

212 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

347 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

206 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

205 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

344 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

346 ms

insight.old.min.js

insight.old.min.js

107 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

88 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

90 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

81 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

83 ms

collect

collect

116 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

97 ms

9-1920x660-1.jpg

9-1920x660-1.jpg

66 ms

7-1920x660.jpg

7-1920x660.jpg

69 ms

11-1920x660-1.jpg

11-1920x660-1.jpg

67 ms

gridtile.png

gridtile.png

49 ms

9-1920x660-1-100x50.jpg

9-1920x660-1-100x50.jpg

49 ms

7-1920x660-100x50.jpg

7-1920x660-100x50.jpg

48 ms

10-1920x660-1-100x50.jpg

10-1920x660-1-100x50.jpg

56 ms

3-1920x660-100x50.jpg

3-1920x660-100x50.jpg

72 ms

11-1920x660-1-100x50.jpg

11-1920x660-1-100x50.jpg

74 ms

collect

collect

93 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

57 ms

Accessibility Review

choice-towing.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

choice-towing.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

choice-towing.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choice-towing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choice-towing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choice-towing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choice Towing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: