8.5 sec in total
2.7 sec
5.5 sec
360 ms
Visit choice.by now to see the best up-to-date Choice content for Belarus and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about choice.by
Развитие социального предпринимательства в Республике Беларусь - 2020. Социальные бизнес-проекты для предпринимателей и предприятий. Примеры. Статьи.
Visit choice.byWe analyzed Choice.by page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
choice.by performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value15.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.291
41/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
2705 ms
199 ms
226 ms
228 ms
224 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Choice.by, 10% (9 requests) were made to Snapwidget.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Choice.by.
Page size can be reduced by 114.5 kB (6%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Choice.by main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choice.by has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (61%)
84
33
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
choice.by
2705 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
199 ms
font-awesome.min.css
226 ms
front.css
228 ms
styles.css
224 ms
settings.css
233 ms
js_composer.min.css
504 ms
css
25 ms
main.min.css
453 ms
font-awesome.min.css
339 ms
fontello.css
337 ms
main-b5a13bc436.css
341 ms
custom-b5a13bc436.css
587 ms
media-b5a13bc436.css
466 ms
style.css
450 ms
Defaults.css
467 ms
jquery.js
679 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
576 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
694 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
571 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
629 ms
js
79 ms
css
29 ms
snapwidget.js
38 ms
font-awesome.css
649 ms
bootstrap.css
664 ms
layouts.css
664 ms
responsive.css
741 ms
lightbox.css
742 ms
mixed.css
742 ms
custom.css
743 ms
scripts.js
761 ms
main.min.js
878 ms
wp-embed.min.js
821 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
841 ms
masonry.js
841 ms
lightbox-2.6.min.js
849 ms
jquery.mixitup.js
918 ms
custom.js
941 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
17 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
16 ms
tag.js
939 ms
logowhite.png
404 ms
22554412_1349984168443421_2002515616_n.png
404 ms
slajder3a.jpg
628 ms
ks-slajder.jpg
550 ms
nashymajstryslajd.jpg
701 ms
proekt4.jpg
534 ms
loader.gif
405 ms
altoros-min-300x200.jpg
405 ms
kc-issoft2-min-300x200.jpg
528 ms
kc-leverx-300x200.jpg
528 ms
ks-maj21_1-min-300x200.jpg
630 ms
kc-dekabr20_10-min-300x200.jpg
631 ms
kc-dekabr20_02-min-300x200.jpg
654 ms
kc-dekabr20_03-min-300x200.jpg
664 ms
ks_leverx-min-300x200.jpg
739 ms
ks_bor-min-300x200.jpg
743 ms
hosterlogo.jpg
743 ms
1025815
368 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
487 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
487 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
530 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
557 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
559 ms
loading.gif
528 ms
close.png
529 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
9 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
17 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
17 ms
embed.vendor.min.760717b3f565c387.css
12 ms
embed.style.min.41abd7aaef93351c.css
25 ms
embed.grid.min.4069f6f840f9102b.css
35 ms
js
31 ms
embed.vendor.min.2f17f0b14ee46c5a.js
25 ms
embed.main.min.65b73ba9362828bd.js
22 ms
iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.0da4d54c7d115e53.js
21 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
79 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
post_type_icons.png
24 ms
162666332_144323700914154_3329271635457071360_n.jpg
141 ms
194375266_844561766186847_1278693729753136300_n.jpg
238 ms
229887533_998338454274126_4654139854114165770_n.jpg
320 ms
258291128_1031867557656271_627160145055220134_n.jpg
281 ms
288010746_4843488479088401_8022782819591271087_n.jpg
247 ms
coloredbg.png
128 ms
revicons.woff
210 ms
advert.gif
790 ms
1
142 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
137 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
145 ms
choice.by accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
choice.by best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
choice.by SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choice.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choice.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
choice.by
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: